On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Aug 5, 2014, at 12:56 AM, Christos Vasilakis <cvasilak(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
On Aug 5, 2014, at 6:37 AM, Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
+1 for 'unifiedpush-node-sender’
+1 for 'unifiedpush-node-sender’ too
while i like ‘unifiedpush-node-sender’ i sort of didn’t want to put the
word node in it. if you are searching on npm/using npm to install
something. it’s node
although, if this also has a CLI component to it, that might make sense
then, ‘$ unifiedpush-node-sender ….. ‘
i’m so torn :)
he! ja, it's valid concerns!
ok, lets go with ‘unifiedpush-node-sender'
soundz good to me
i wouldn’t rename the github repo thought.
+1
tisdag 5 augusti 2014 skrev Daniel Passos <daniel(a)passos.me>:
> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui(a)redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Do we want to also rename it.
>>
>> the java sender is called( in maven ), ‘unifiedpush-java-sender’
>>
>> while the node one(in npm) is ‘aerogear-sender-client’
>>
>> i was thinking the name should probably be ‘unifiedpush-sender’ or
>> ‘unifiedpush-sender’
>>
>
> I like that
>
> +1 for ‘unifiedpush-sender’ or ‘unifiedpush-sender’
>
> Or unifiedpush-node-sender
>
>
>> what do others think?
>>
>>
>> On Aug 1, 2014, at 8:48 AM, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> :), do we a JIRA, i can whip something up for a guide
>> On Aug 1, 2014, at 7:22 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Whenever Luke is ready ? :)
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> When?
>>>
>>> On 2014-08-01, Sebastien Blanc wrote:
>>> > On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <
>>> matzew(a)apache.org>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > Hi there,
>>> > >
>>> > > a few questions:
>>> > >
>>> > > * based on
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>>
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-nodejs-client/commit/a5a...
>>> > >
>>> > > should we do a new release of the node.js sender ?
>>> > >
>>> > yes
>>> >
>>> > >
>>> > > * going over the docs, do we have 'guide' or so that we can
link
>>> here:
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>>
http://aerogear.org/docs/unifiedpush/ups_userguide/next/#_server_integrat...
>>> > >
>>> > not that I'm aware of but we could link (for now) to the README of
the
>>> > github which contains instructions.
>>> >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > Thanks!
>>> > > Matthias
>>> > >
>>> > > --
>>> > > Matthias Wessendorf
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf