+1
On Jan 14, 2013, at 12:49 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> our client libries are using the "auth/enroll" value for the actual
> registration request, examples:
> -
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-ios/blob/master/AeroGear-iOS/AeroGea...
> -
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-js/blob/master/src/authentication/ad...
> -
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-android/blob/master/src/org/jboss/ae...
>
> However, the server uses a different default ("auth/register"):
> -
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-security/blob/master/src/main/java/o...
> -
https://github.com/aerogear/TODO/blob/master/server/src/main/java/org/aer...
>
> It was a decision from the past, that we have this "model", however -
> rethinking causes some concerns... Is that really ideal? Wouldn't it
> be just
> better to have matching default, on the client AND the server ?
>
> Please vote:
> [+1] let's change the server default to match the "enroll" setting
> from the client libraries
> [0] I don't care
> [-1] nah, let's keep all as is, since the client can override everything
>
>
> Cheers!
> Matthias
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev