Re: [aerogear-dev] AeroGear.js + ES6

On Mar 20, 2014, at 1:18 PM, tolis emmanouilidis <tolisemm(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: +1 for ES6 Do you think that ES6 classes will affect the way AeroGear.js library is structured? maybe a little in the way we do inheritance. Thanks, Tolis 2014-03-20 16:50 GMT+02:00 Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org&gt;: > go for it, can't wait for ES7 and have a branch named "LEGEN...WAIT FOR > IT...DARY!" > > -- > abstractj > > On March 20, 2014 at 11:31:23 AM, Lucas Holmquist (lholmqui(a)redhat.com) > wrote: > > > Hey peeps, > > > > I've been seeing libraries such and Angular and Ember starting > > to author in ES6( the next iteration of javascript ) and then > transpiling > > back to ES5( the current iteration of javascript ). > > > > So i've created a new branch called "get_to_tha_choppa" that > > will be tracking these changes to see if we can benefit from this. > > > > this could also help us in the quest for AMD/Browser Modules/New > > Fancy Term > > > > some related JIRA > > > > https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGJS-149 > > > > incase people don't get the "get_to_tha_choppa" reference > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs_OacEq2Sk > > > > > > -Luke > > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev