One problem we will have to overcome is that we have many different modules
versioned differently, so we can't simply version whole site as it is. This
will need some cleverish idea :-)
st 27. 5. 2015 v 16:08 odesílatel Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org>
napsal:
+1 go ahead
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Lukáš Fryč <lukas(a)fryc.eu> wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> Tadeas started a discussion about versioning documentation in the thread
> [1],
>
>
> and I must agree - it is a good idea to version documentation (and
> possibly also guides),
>
> especially since our UPS Console now points from the UI to the
> documentation -
> that is a great feature but I'm worried about maintanance of that
> solution, a documentation tend to change in time, with links no longer
> being valid.
>
>
> Lot of projects publish generated documentation separately, hosting it
> e.g. on
docs.jboss.org (see [2] for a sample).
>
> I'd suggest to version both, API documentation and guides on a separated
> server.
> Perhaps we could version whole site?
>
>
>
> WDYT?
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> ~ Lukas
>
> [1]
>
http://aerogear-dev.1069024.n5.nabble.com/aerogear-dev-UnifiedPush-Server...
> [2]
http://docs.jboss.org/richfaces/
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
--
--
"The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato
-
@abstractj
-
Volenti Nihil Difficile
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev