On Fri, 9 May 2014 08:45:35 -0700 (PDT)
Andrea Vibelli <avibelli(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Great that we agree on 1), which is the most important.
@Karel: what change would you require about checkstyle plugin (just
wondering)?
Right, I've realized that it is already there after posting. Thanks Andrea!
Karel Piwko wrote
> What about:
>
> 1/ Release ag-misc 0.1.2 to Central to fix ag-parent
> 2/ Release ag-parent 0.2.1 to Central, using 0.2.0 of ag-misc
> => aligns minor version with ag-misc
> => Optionally: Adds checkstyle to pluginMngmt (AEROGEAR-358) (I can send a
> PR)
>
> No deletes needed. Maven world will not collapse ;-)
>
> Karel
>
>
> On Fri, 9 May 2014 12:21:15 +0200
> Matthias Wessendorf <
> mwessendorf@
> > wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Andrea reported that the 0.1.2 release (see [1]) contains the wrong
>> version
>> number (0.2.0).
>> This artifact was already pushed to maven central.
>>
>> On IRC we had the following idea:
>> * update master to 0.1.2-SNAPSHOT
>> * perform the release again (that hopefully will result in 0.1.2 on maven
>> central)
>>
>> That still means we have a 0.2.0 on maven central. I will ask my contacts
>> at Sonatype to remove the 0.2.0 bits;
>>
>> If folks are OK w/ that, I am happy to perform these steps by Monday
>> morning
>>
>> Greetings,
>> Matthias
>>
>> [1]
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-misc/blob/0.1.2/pom.xml
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev@.jboss
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
View this message in context:
http://aerogear-dev.1069024.n5.nabble.com/aerogear-dev-aerogear-misc-rele...
Sent from the aerogear-dev mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev