did we discuss using the wiki, or was that for something else
On Mar 25, 2014, at 5:11 AM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 25 Mar 2014, at 08:55, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
> We got already almost all the material in the current readme and we can split that
nicely into a howto and then rewriting maybe some parts.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 7:33 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I feel a bit of the documentation might be misleading and not always that great to go
over.
>
> Instead of adding more and more the README, I think we should (w/in the REPO) start
to write a guide/book on HOWTO.
+1 to add the doc in the relevant repo
We could alway inlude part of the ascidoc text in aerogear web site with the same
mechanism as shown in this PR:
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear.org/pull/275
>
> Regarding the actual format, I think asciidoc comes to mind;
>
>
> Any thoughts ?
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev