On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 9:14 PM, Kris Borchers <kris(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Not sure if I agree with that or not. Especially since the JS docs
are
generated from comments in the source, I would think that documentation
issues should be reported here. Anyone else have an opinion?
+1 on having docs at AG-JS
On May 22, 2013, at 2:09 PM, Daniel Passos <daniel(a)passos.me> wrote:
I don't know but I think maybe docs is umbrella on AeroGear
On May 22, 2013 3:58 PM, "Kris Borchers" <kris.borchers(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> I would like to start creating components for the AGJS project in JIRA.
> Here is the list I have come up with. Please comment, agree, add, remove as
> you see fit.
>
> auth
> pipeline
> datamanager
> courier
> showcase
> examples
> docs
> grunt-build
> builder-node
> builder-UI
> dist <= this is for our dist build/repo
> CI
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf