On 16 Dec 2014, at 20:28, Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org&gt; wrote: +1 go for it — abstractj PGP: 0x84DC9914 On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Andres Galante <agalante(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: On guides, there are some strange things happening on the way we structure things. For example: Ther is a Getting Started guides on the main index: https://aerogear.org/docs/guides/ and there are also getting started on the iOS guides https://aerogear.org/docs/guides/aerogear-ios/ Do you think its worth it for me to map the guides and re arrange them in a more consistent way for the new website? Like separate them per feature or per platform. _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 8:15 PM, Andres Galante <agalante(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > On guides, there are some strange things happening on the way we structure > things. > +1 an overhaul on the structure is needed > > For example: > > Ther is a Getting Started guides on the main index: > https://aerogear.org/docs/guides/ > > and there are also getting started on the iOS guides > https://aerogear.org/docs/guides/aerogear-ios/ > > Do you think its worth it for me to map the guides and re arrange them in > a more consistent way for the new website? that would be very nice! > Like separate them per feature or per platform. > yeah, I think that's the tricky question. Perhaps per feature, and underneath per platform? > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

I'll make a map tomorrow the current state and how it would be if we separate the docs, roadmaps, demos and guides per feature or per platform. I'll share it so we can build a solid structure together. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bruno Oliveira" <bruno(a)abstractj.org&gt; To: "AeroGear Developer Mailing List" <aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; Cc: "AeroGear Developer Mailing List" <aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 7:00:09 PM Subject: Re: [aerogear-dev] Restructure Guides on Aerogear.org I vote per feature — abstractj PGP: 0x84DC9914 On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 7:48 PM, Matthias Wessendorf < matzew(a)apache.org > wrote: On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 8:15 PM, Andres Galante < agalante(a)redhat.com > wrote: On guides, there are some strange things happening on the way we structure things. +1 an overhaul on the structure is needed For example: Ther is a Getting Started guides on the main index: https://aerogear.org/docs/guides/ and there are also getting started on the iOS guides https://aerogear.org/docs/guides/aerogear-ios/ Do you think its worth it for me to map the guides and re arrange them in a more consistent way for the new website? that would be very nice! Like separate them per feature or per platform. yeah, I think that's the tricky question. Perhaps per feature, and underneath per platform? _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev