All, Should the import/export feature only goes to master (1.1) or also to the 1.0.x branch ? Sebi _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 9:41 AM, Lukáš Fryč <lukas.fryc(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > (Summary of the IRC discussion) > > We should at some point cut the new features coming into 1.0.x and focus > them to 1.1 instead. > > That way, 1.0.x will stay open for bug fixes / stabilization efforts. > > If there will be requirements to backport some limited feature from 1.1 > to 1.0.x, we can still do that, > but default should be 1.1. > +1 on 1.1.x / master for this > > ~ Lukas > > > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc(a)gmail.com&gt; > wrote: > >> All, >> >> Should the import/export feature only goes to master (1.1) or also to >> the 1.0.x branch ? >> >> Sebi >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> > > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev