Hi, SimplePush Server uses Netty 4 and now also vert.x (2.0.0-beta4-SNAPSHOT) which both require Java 7. So it's not only PushEE anymore that has this requirement. cheers, /Dan On 29 May 2013 15:11, Karel Piwko <kpiwko(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > Hi, > > Most of the code is JDK6, except PushEE which requires JDK 6. Android > requires > JDK 6 API as well, thanks Summers for pointing that out. The only component > that requires JDK7 is PushEE afaict. > > So, even if JDK 6 is officially EOLed (at least Oracle's one), I'd prefer > to > limit our code to JDK6 features. Does it make sense? > > I can setup animal sniffer plugin to enforce JDK API conformance and > send PRs if you will - btw, do you guys already have a common parent with > plugin > configuration? > > The other question is default runtime. Would you guys recommend JDK7 or > JDK6? > I'm biased here to decide myself. > > Thanks, > > Karel > > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >

Honestly, I don't see a huge issue with JDK 7.... On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Karel Piwko <kpiwko(a)redhat.com <mailto:kpiwko@redhat.com>> wrote: Good to know. I haven't seen any enforcer plugin rule and compiler plugin is set to 1.6, so I though it is still on JDK6. Karel On Wed, 29 May 2013 15:27:48 +0200 Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius(a)gmail.com <mailto:daniel.bevenius@gmail.com>> wrote: > Hi, > > SimplePush Server uses Netty 4 and now also vert.x (2.0.0-beta4-SNAPSHOT) > which both require Java 7. So it's not only PushEE anymore that has this > requirement. > > cheers, > > /Dan > > > On 29 May 2013 15:11, Karel Piwko <kpiwko(a)redhat.com <mailto:kpiwko@redhat.com>> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Most of the code is JDK6, except PushEE which requires JDK 6. Android > > requires > > JDK 6 API as well, thanks Summers for pointing that out. The only component > > that requires JDK7 is PushEE afaict. > > > > So, even if JDK 6 is officially EOLed (at least Oracle's one), I'd prefer > > to > > limit our code to JDK6 features. Does it make sense? > > > > I can setup animal sniffer plugin to enforce JDK API conformance and > > send PRs if you will - btw, do you guys already have a common parent with > > plugin > > configuration? > > > > The other question is default runtime. Would you guys recommend JDK7 or > > JDK6? > > I'm biased here to decide myself. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Karel > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > aerogear-dev mailing list > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org <mailto:bruno@abstractj.org>> wrote: Only for Android as Summers already mentioned. yeah - I ment for JDK7 on all other things, besides Android :) Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > Honestly, I don't see a huge issue with JDK 7.... > > > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Karel Piwko <kpiwko(a)redhat.com <mailto:kpiwko@redhat.com> > <mailto:kpiwko@redhat.com <mailto:kpiwko@redhat.com>>> wrote: > > Good to know. I haven't seen any enforcer plugin rule and compiler > plugin is set > to 1.6, so I though it is still on JDK6. > > Karel > > > On Wed, 29 May 2013 15:27:48 +0200 > Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius(a)gmail.com <mailto:daniel.bevenius@gmail.com> > <mailto:daniel.bevenius@gmail.com <mailto:daniel.bevenius@gmail.com>>> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > SimplePush Server uses Netty 4 and now also vert.x > (2.0.0-beta4-SNAPSHOT) > > which both require Java 7. So it's not only PushEE anymore that > has this > > requirement. > > > > cheers, > > > > /Dan > > > > > > On 29 May 2013 15:11, Karel Piwko <kpiwko(a)redhat.com <mailto:kpiwko@redhat.com> > <mailto:kpiwko@redhat.com <mailto:kpiwko@redhat.com>>> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Most of the code is JDK6, except PushEE which requires JDK 6. > Android > > > requires > > > JDK 6 API as well, thanks Summers for pointing that out. The > only component > > > that requires JDK7 is PushEE afaict. > > > > > > So, even if JDK 6 is officially EOLed (at least Oracle's one), > I'd prefer > > > to > > > limit our code to JDK6 features. Does it make sense? > > > > > > I can setup animal sniffer plugin to enforce JDK API > conformance and > > > send PRs if you will - btw, do you guys already have a common > parent with > > > plugin > > > configuration? > > > > > > The other question is default runtime. Would you guys recommend > JDK7 or > > > JDK6? > > > I'm biased here to decide myself. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Karel > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > aerogear-dev mailing list > > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org> <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>> > > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org> <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

Security has dependency with other projects, so just in case I'm testing it against both https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-security-picketlink/blob/master/.tra... Also OTP must support Android and the backend, testing both for the same reason. Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > > > > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org > <mailto:bruno@abstractj.org>> wrote: > > Only for Android as Summers already mentioned. > > > yeah - I ment for JDK7 on all other things, besides Android :) > > > Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > > Honestly, I don't see a huge issue with JDK 7.... > > > > > > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Karel Piwko <kpiwko(a)redhat.com > <mailto:kpiwko@redhat.com> > > <mailto:kpiwko@redhat.com <mailto:kpiwko@redhat.com>>> wrote: > > > > Good to know. I haven't seen any enforcer plugin rule and > compiler > > plugin is set > > to 1.6, so I though it is still on JDK6. > > > > Karel > > > > > > On Wed, 29 May 2013 15:27:48 +0200 > > Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius(a)gmail.com > <mailto:daniel.bevenius@gmail.com> > > <mailto:daniel.bevenius@gmail.com > <mailto:daniel.bevenius@gmail.com>>> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > SimplePush Server uses Netty 4 and now also vert.x > > (2.0.0-beta4-SNAPSHOT) > > > which both require Java 7. So it's not only PushEE anymore that > > has this > > > requirement. > > > > > > cheers, > > > > > > /Dan > > > > > > > > > On 29 May 2013 15:11, Karel Piwko <kpiwko(a)redhat.com > <mailto:kpiwko@redhat.com> > > <mailto:kpiwko@redhat.com <mailto:kpiwko@redhat.com>>> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Most of the code is JDK6, except PushEE which requires JDK 6. > > Android > > > > requires > > > > JDK 6 API as well, thanks Summers for pointing that out. The > > only component > > > > that requires JDK7 is PushEE afaict. > > > > > > > > So, even if JDK 6 is officially EOLed (at least Oracle's one), > > I'd prefer > > > > to > > > > limit our code to JDK6 features. Does it make sense? > > > > > > > > I can setup animal sniffer plugin to enforce JDK API > > conformance and > > > > send PRs if you will - btw, do you guys already have a common > > parent with > > > > plugin > > > > configuration? > > > > > > > > The other question is default runtime. Would you guys recommend > > JDK7 or > > > > JDK6? > > > > I'm biased here to decide myself. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Karel > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > aerogear-dev mailing list > > > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org> > <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org > <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>> > > > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > aerogear-dev mailing list > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org> > <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org > <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > > > _______________________________________________ > > aerogear-dev mailing list > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

I still don't get it. How am I supposed to run code compiled with -target 1.7 on JDK6? This will throw UnsupportedClassVersionError. The only way how to test on both JDK6 and JDK7 is to have code compiled against target 1.6. And this would require source 1.6. So, if Vert.x (1.3.1 and 2.0.0.beta3 targets JDK7) and Netty (4.0.0.CR3 targets JDK6) are compiled targeting JDK7, testing on JDK6 is out of scope. Karel On Wed, 29 May 2013 10:43:32 -0300 Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org&gt; wrote: > Security has dependency with other projects, so just in case I'm testing > it against both > https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-security-picketlink/blob/master/.tra... > > Also OTP must support Android and the backend, testing both for the same > reason. > > Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org > > <mailto:bruno@abstractj.org>> wrote: > > > > Only for Android as Summers already mentioned. > > > > > > yeah - I ment for JDK7 on all other things, besides Android :) > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > > > Honestly, I don't see a huge issue with JDK 7.... > > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Karel Piwko <kpiwko(a)redhat.com > > <mailto:kpiwko@redhat.com> > > > <mailto:kpiwko@redhat.com <mailto:kpiwko@redhat.com>>> wrote: > > > > > > Good to know. I haven't seen any enforcer plugin rule and > > compiler > > > plugin is set > > > to 1.6, so I though it is still on JDK6. > > > > > > Karel > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 29 May 2013 15:27:48 +0200 > > > Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius(a)gmail.com > > <mailto:daniel.bevenius@gmail.com> > > > <mailto:daniel.bevenius@gmail.com > > <mailto:daniel.bevenius@gmail.com>>> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > SimplePush Server uses Netty 4 and now also vert.x > > > (2.0.0-beta4-SNAPSHOT) > > > > which both require Java 7. So it's not only PushEE anymore that > > > has this > > > > requirement. > > > > > > > > cheers, > > > > > > > > /Dan > > > > > > > > > > > > On 29 May 2013 15:11, Karel Piwko <kpiwko(a)redhat.com > > <mailto:kpiwko@redhat.com> > > > <mailto:kpiwko@redhat.com <mailto:kpiwko@redhat.com>>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > Most of the code is JDK6, except PushEE which requires JDK 6. > > > Android > > > > > requires > > > > > JDK 6 API as well, thanks Summers for pointing that out. The > > > only component > > > > > that requires JDK7 is PushEE afaict. > > > > > > > > > > So, even if JDK 6 is officially EOLed (at least Oracle's one), > > > I'd prefer > > > > > to > > > > > limit our code to JDK6 features. Does it make sense? > > > > > > > > > > I can setup animal sniffer plugin to enforce JDK API > > > conformance and > > > > > send PRs if you will - btw, do you guys already have a common > > > parent with > > > > > plugin > > > > > configuration? > > > > > > > > > > The other question is default runtime. Would you guys recommend > > > JDK7 or > > > > > JDK6? > > > > > I'm biased here to decide myself. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > Karel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > aerogear-dev mailing list > > > > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > > <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org> > > <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org > > <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>> > > > > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > aerogear-dev mailing list > > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > > <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org> > > <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org > > <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>> > > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > > > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > aerogear-dev mailing list > > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto: aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; > > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > _______________________________________________ > > aerogear-dev mailing list > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > > > _______________________________________________ > > aerogear-dev mailing list > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

what's wrong when some use JDK7 (e.g. SimplePush/PushEE) and some use JDK6 (e.g. Android, OTP) ?

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Karel Piwko <kpiwko(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > I still don't get it. > > How am I supposed to run code compiled with -target 1.7 on JDK6? > This will throw UnsupportedClassVersionError. > > The only way how to test on both JDK6 and JDK7 is to have code compiled > against > target 1.6. And this would require source 1.6. So, if Vert.x (1.3.1 and > 2.0.0.beta3 targets JDK7) and Netty (4.0.0.CR3 targets JDK6) are compiled > targeting JDK7, testing on JDK6 is out of scope. > > Karel > > On Wed, 29 May 2013 10:43:32 -0300 > Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org&gt; wrote: > > > Security has dependency with other projects, so just in case I'm testing > > it against both > > > https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-security-picketlink/blob/master/.tra... > > > > Also OTP must support Android and the backend, testing both for the same > > reason. > > > > Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org > > > <mailto:bruno@abstractj.org>> wrote: > > > > > > Only for Android as Summers already mentioned. > > > > > > > > > yeah - I ment for JDK7 on all other things, besides Android :) > > > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > > > > Honestly, I don't see a huge issue with JDK 7.... > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Karel Piwko <kpiwko(a)redhat.com > > > <mailto:kpiwko@redhat.com> > > > > <mailto:kpiwko@redhat.com <mailto:kpiwko@redhat.com>>> wrote: > > > > > > > > Good to know. I haven't seen any enforcer plugin rule and > > > compiler > > > > plugin is set > > > > to 1.6, so I though it is still on JDK6. > > > > > > > > Karel > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 29 May 2013 15:27:48 +0200 > > > > Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius(a)gmail.com > > > <mailto:daniel.bevenius@gmail.com> > > > > <mailto:daniel.bevenius@gmail.com > > > <mailto:daniel.bevenius@gmail.com>>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > SimplePush Server uses Netty 4 and now also vert.x > > > > (2.0.0-beta4-SNAPSHOT) > > > > > which both require Java 7. So it's not only PushEE anymore > that > > > > has this > > > > > requirement. > > > > > > > > > > cheers, > > > > > > > > > > /Dan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 29 May 2013 15:11, Karel Piwko <kpiwko(a)redhat.com > > > <mailto:kpiwko@redhat.com> > > > > <mailto:kpiwko@redhat.com <mailto:kpiwko@redhat.com>>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > Most of the code is JDK6, except PushEE which requires JDK > 6. > > > > Android > > > > > > requires > > > > > > JDK 6 API as well, thanks Summers for pointing that out. The > > > > only component > > > > > > that requires JDK7 is PushEE afaict. > > > > > > > > > > > > So, even if JDK 6 is officially EOLed (at least Oracle's > one), > > > > I'd prefer > > > > > > to > > > > > > limit our code to JDK6 features. Does it make sense? > > > > > > > > > > > > I can setup animal sniffer plugin to enforce JDK API > > > > conformance and > > > > > > send PRs if you will - btw, do you guys already have a > common > > > > parent with > > > > > > plugin > > > > > > configuration? > > > > > > > > > > > > The other question is default runtime. Would you guys > recommend > > > > JDK7 or > > > > > > JDK6? > > > > > > I'm biased here to decide myself. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > Karel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > aerogear-dev mailing list > > > > > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > > > <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org> > > > <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org > > > <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>> > > > > > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > aerogear-dev mailing list > > > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > > > <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org> > > > <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org > > > <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>> > > > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > > > > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > aerogear-dev mailing list > > > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto: > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; > > > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > > > aerogear-dev mailing list > > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org> > > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > > > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > aerogear-dev mailing list > > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > _______________________________________________ > > aerogear-dev mailing list > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >

https://github.com/matzew/pushee/commit/89d013af95bf34df60c5edf8f64313e51... https://github.com/matzew/pushee/commit/1bcbf177a8ae8cd32636cc47423ab1879... should be 1.6 now (at least here it compiles also with an explicit 1.6 setting in the pom) -M On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Karel Piwko <kpiwko(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > On Thu, 30 May 2013 08:37:57 +0200 > Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: > > > what's wrong when some use JDK7 (e.g. SimplePush/PushEE) and some use > JDK6 > > (e.g. Android, OTP) ? > > The consequence is that just can't run parts that use JDK7 on JDK6, so JDK6 > support is dropped. > > There is nothing wrong with dropping JDK6 support if required to achieve > some > functionality, I'm just trying to point out that technical decisions being > done > right now will affect scope of supported environments in future. > > > > > > > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Karel Piwko <kpiwko(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > > > > I still don't get it. > > > > > > How am I supposed to run code compiled with -target 1.7 on JDK6? > > > This will throw UnsupportedClassVersionError. > > > > > > The only way how to test on both JDK6 and JDK7 is to have code compiled > > > against > > > target 1.6. And this would require source 1.6. So, if Vert.x (1.3.1 and > > > 2.0.0.beta3 targets JDK7) and Netty (4.0.0.CR3 targets JDK6) are > compiled > > > targeting JDK7, testing on JDK6 is out of scope. > > > > > > Karel > > > > > > On Wed, 29 May 2013 10:43:32 -0300 > > > Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org&gt; wrote: > > > > > > > Security has dependency with other projects, so just in case I'm > testing > > > > it against both > > > > > > > > https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-security-picketlink/blob/master/.tra... > > > > > > > > Also OTP must support Android and the backend, testing both for the > same > > > > reason. > > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Bruno Oliveira < > bruno(a)abstractj.org > > > > > <mailto:bruno@abstractj.org>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Only for Android as Summers already mentioned. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > yeah - I ment for JDK7 on all other things, besides Android :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > > > > > > Honestly, I don't see a huge issue with JDK 7.... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Karel Piwko < > kpiwko(a)redhat.com > > > > > <mailto:kpiwko@redhat.com> > > > > > > <mailto:kpiwko@redhat.com <mailto:kpiwko@redhat.com>>> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Good to know. I haven't seen any enforcer plugin rule > and > > > > > compiler > > > > > > plugin is set > > > > > > to 1.6, so I though it is still on JDK6. > > > > > > > > > > > > Karel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 29 May 2013 15:27:48 +0200 > > > > > > Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius(a)gmail.com > > > > > <mailto:daniel.bevenius@gmail.com> > > > > > > <mailto:daniel.bevenius@gmail.com > > > > > <mailto:daniel.bevenius@gmail.com>>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > SimplePush Server uses Netty 4 and now also vert.x > > > > > > (2.0.0-beta4-SNAPSHOT) > > > > > > > which both require Java 7. So it's not only PushEE anymore > > > that > > > > > > has this > > > > > > > requirement. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cheers, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > /Dan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 29 May 2013 15:11, Karel Piwko <kpiwko(a)redhat.com > > > > > <mailto:kpiwko@redhat.com> > > > > > > <mailto:kpiwko@redhat.com <mailto:kpiwko@redhat.com>>> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Most of the code is JDK6, except PushEE which requires > JDK > > > 6. > > > > > > Android > > > > > > > > requires > > > > > > > > JDK 6 API as well, thanks Summers for pointing that > out. The > > > > > > only component > > > > > > > > that requires JDK7 is PushEE afaict. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, even if JDK 6 is officially EOLed (at least Oracle's > > > one), > > > > > > I'd prefer > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > limit our code to JDK6 features. Does it make sense? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I can setup animal sniffer plugin to enforce JDK API > > > > > > conformance and > > > > > > > > send PRs if you will - btw, do you guys already have a > > > common > > > > > > parent with > > > > > > > > plugin > > > > > > > > configuration? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The other question is default runtime. Would you guys > > > recommend > > > > > > JDK7 or > > > > > > > > JDK6? > > > > > > > > I'm biased here to decide myself. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Karel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > > > aerogear-dev mailing list > > > > > > > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > > > > > <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org> > > > > > <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org > > > > > <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>> > > > > > > > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > aerogear-dev mailing list > > > > > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > > > > > <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org> > > > > > <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org > > > > > <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>> > > > > > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > > > > > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > > > > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > > > > > > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > aerogear-dev mailing list > > > > > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto: > > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; > > > > > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > aerogear-dev mailing list > > > > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto: > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; > > > > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > > > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > > > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > > > > > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > aerogear-dev mailing list > > > > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > > > > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > aerogear-dev mailing list > > > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > > > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > aerogear-dev mailing list > > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >

Hi Karel, maybe I'm not following you on it, but let me try to explain 2 scenarios for OTP for example: - Android developer wants to make use of the OTP project aerogear-otp-java In this situation we test aerogear-otp-java against JDK 6, because this must be supported on android - Backend developer running new features from JDK 7 and totally tied to that (because he wants to be cool and follow the trends) In this situation we test aerogear-otp-java against JDK 7, only to avoid surprises when some developer start to add it to the codebase. So travis will test it against JDK 6 and JDK 7 for these reasons. Karel Piwko wrote: > I still don't get it. > > How am I supposed to run code compiled with -target 1.7 on JDK6? > This will throw UnsupportedClassVersionError. > > The only way how to test on both JDK6 and JDK7 is to have code compiled > against target 1.6. And this would require source 1.6. So, if Vert.x (1.3.1 > and 2.0.0.beta3 targets JDK7) and Netty (4.0.0.CR3 targets JDK6) are > compiled targeting JDK7, testing on JDK6 is out of scope. > > Karel > > On Wed, 29 May 2013 10:43:32 -0300 > Bruno Oliveira&lt;bruno(a)abstractj.org&gt; wrote: > >> Security has dependency with other projects, so just in case I'm testing >> it against both >> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-security-picketlink/blob/master/.tra... >> >> Also OTP must support Android and the backend, testing both for the same >> reason. >> >> Matthias Wessendorf wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Bruno Oliveira&lt;bruno(a)abstractj.org >>> <mailto:bruno@abstractj.org>> wrote: >>> >>> Only for Android as Summers already mentioned. >>> >>> >>> yeah - I ment for JDK7 on all other things, besides Android :) >>> >>> >>> Matthias Wessendorf wrote: >>> > Honestly, I don't see a huge issue with JDK 7.... >>> > >>> > >>> > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Karel Piwko&lt;kpiwko(a)redhat.com >>> <mailto:kpiwko@redhat.com> >>> > <mailto:kpiwko@redhat.com<mailto:kpiwko@redhat.com>>> wrote: >>> > >>> > Good to know. I haven't seen any enforcer plugin rule and >>> compiler >>> > plugin is set >>> > to 1.6, so I though it is still on JDK6. >>> > >>> > Karel >>> > >>> > >>> > On Wed, 29 May 2013 15:27:48 +0200 >>> > Daniel Bevenius&lt;daniel.bevenius(a)gmail.com >>> <mailto:daniel.bevenius@gmail.com> >>> > <mailto:daniel.bevenius@gmail.com >>> <mailto:daniel.bevenius@gmail.com>>> wrote: >>> > >>> > > Hi, >>> > > >>> > > SimplePush Server uses Netty 4 and now also vert.x >>> > (2.0.0-beta4-SNAPSHOT) >>> > > which both require Java 7. So it's not only PushEE anymore >>> > > that >>> > has this >>> > > requirement. >>> > > >>> > > cheers, >>> > > >>> > > /Dan >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > On 29 May 2013 15:11, Karel Piwko&lt;kpiwko(a)redhat.com >>> <mailto:kpiwko@redhat.com> >>> > <mailto:kpiwko@redhat.com<mailto:kpiwko@redhat.com>>> wrote: >>> > > >>> > > > Hi, >>> > > > >>> > > > Most of the code is JDK6, except PushEE which requires JDK >>> > > > 6. >>> > Android >>> > > > requires >>> > > > JDK 6 API as well, thanks Summers for pointing that out. >>> > > > The >>> > only component >>> > > > that requires JDK7 is PushEE afaict. >>> > > > >>> > > > So, even if JDK 6 is officially EOLed (at least Oracle's >>> > > > one), >>> > I'd prefer >>> > > > to >>> > > > limit our code to JDK6 features. Does it make sense? >>> > > > >>> > > > I can setup animal sniffer plugin to enforce JDK API >>> > conformance and >>> > > > send PRs if you will - btw, do you guys already have a >>> > > > common >>> > parent with >>> > > > plugin >>> > > > configuration? >>> > > > >>> > > > The other question is default runtime. Would you guys >>> > > > recommend >>> > JDK7 or >>> > > > JDK6? >>> > > > I'm biased here to decide myself. >>> > > > >>> > > > Thanks, >>> > > > >>> > > > Karel >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > _______________________________________________ >>> > > > aerogear-dev mailing list >>> > > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org> >>> <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org >>> <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>> >>> > > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>> > > > >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > aerogear-dev mailing list >>> > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org> >>> <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org >>> <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>> >>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Matthias Wessendorf >>> > >>> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > aerogear-dev mailing list >>> > aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org<mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org> >>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>> _______________________________________________ >>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>> aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org<mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org> >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Matthias Wessendorf >>> >>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

Yes, but we can't guarantee that every single developer (including me) will follow this precondition, but CI can do it.

Karel Piwko wrote: > Hi Bruno, > > your test case make sense. However, the precondition is that > aerogear-otp-java impl does not use any JDK7 features, e.g. it is compiled > targeting JDK6. > > In case it doesn't, developer is forced to use JDK7 despite he would like to > use JDK6. _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev