Security has dependency with other projects, so just in case I'm testing
it against both
Also OTP must support Android and the backend, testing both for the same
reason.
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org
<mailto:bruno@abstractj.org>> wrote:
Only for Android as Summers already mentioned.
yeah - I ment for JDK7 on all other things, besides Android :)
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> Honestly, I don't see a huge issue with JDK 7....
>
>
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Karel Piwko <kpiwko(a)redhat.com
<mailto:kpiwko@redhat.com>
> <mailto:kpiwko@redhat.com <mailto:kpiwko@redhat.com>>> wrote:
>
> Good to know. I haven't seen any enforcer plugin rule and
compiler
> plugin is set
> to 1.6, so I though it is still on JDK6.
>
> Karel
>
>
> On Wed, 29 May 2013 15:27:48 +0200
> Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius(a)gmail.com
<mailto:daniel.bevenius@gmail.com>
> <mailto:daniel.bevenius@gmail.com
<mailto:daniel.bevenius@gmail.com>>> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > SimplePush Server uses Netty 4 and now also vert.x
> (2.0.0-beta4-SNAPSHOT)
> > which both require Java 7. So it's not only PushEE anymore that
> has this
> > requirement.
> >
> > cheers,
> >
> > /Dan
> >
> >
> > On 29 May 2013 15:11, Karel Piwko <kpiwko(a)redhat.com
<mailto:kpiwko@redhat.com>
> <mailto:kpiwko@redhat.com <mailto:kpiwko@redhat.com>>> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Most of the code is JDK6, except PushEE which requires JDK 6.
> Android
> > > requires
> > > JDK 6 API as well, thanks Summers for pointing that out. The
> only component
> > > that requires JDK7 is PushEE afaict.
> > >
> > > So, even if JDK 6 is officially EOLed (at least Oracle's one),
> I'd prefer
> > > to
> > > limit our code to JDK6 features. Does it make sense?
> > >
> > > I can setup animal sniffer plugin to enforce JDK API
> conformance and
> > > send PRs if you will - btw, do you guys already have a common
> parent with
> > > plugin
> > > configuration?
> > >
> > > The other question is default runtime. Would you guys recommend
> JDK7 or
> > > JDK6?
> > > I'm biased here to decide myself.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Karel
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
<mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
<mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
<mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>>
> > >
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> > >
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
<mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
<mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
<mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>>
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev