Hi Yahor, QUnit or Jasmine is a pretty good choice. Aerogear uses QUnit from what I've seen so far and QE definitely goes QUnit :-) Karel [1] https://github.com/arquillian/arquillian-extension-qunit On Thu, 4 Jul 2013 13:07:33 +0300 Yahor Radtsevich <yradtsevich(a)exadel.com&gt; wrote: > Hello all! > > I am from the JBoss Tools team, and I am developing CordovaSim - a > simulator for Cordova-based hybrid projects. > Now we are looking for a framework for JavaScript testing. We are planning > to use it mostly to test various Cordova API methods. > > Which framework do you use in the Aerogear development? > > How about Jasmine? > > I will appreciate any suggestions. > _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

On Thu, 4 Jul 2013 16:12:36 +0300 Yahor Radtsevich <yradtsevich(a)exadel.com&gt; wrote: > Thank you very much Karel! > > We will try both of them. I've just figured out that Luke is using Mocha - http://visionmedia.github.io/mocha/. Looks nice as well.

> > On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Karel Piwko <kpiwko(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > >> Hi Yahor, >> >> QUnit or Jasmine is a pretty good choice. Aerogear uses QUnit from what >> I've >> seen so far and QE definitely goes QUnit :-) >> >> Karel >> >> [1] https://github.com/arquillian/arquillian-extension-qunit >> >> On Thu, 4 Jul 2013 13:07:33 +0300 >> Yahor Radtsevich <yradtsevich(a)exadel.com&gt; wrote: >> >>> Hello all! >>> >>> I am from the JBoss Tools team, and I am developing CordovaSim - a >>> simulator for Cordova-based hybrid projects. >>> Now we are looking for a framework for JavaScript testing. We are >> planning >>> to use it mostly to test various Cordova API methods. >>> >>> Which framework do you use in the Aerogear development? >>> >>> How about Jasmine? >>> >>> I will appreciate any suggestions. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

ummm, i did what now?

On Jul 4, 2013, at 10:25 AM, Kris Borchers <kborcher(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > > On Jul 4, 2013, at 8:26, Karel Piwko <kpiwko(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > >> On Thu, 4 Jul 2013 16:12:36 +0300 >> Yahor Radtsevich <yradtsevich(a)exadel.com&gt; wrote: >> >>> Thank you very much Karel! >>> >>> We will try both of them. >> >> I've just figured out that Luke is using Mocha - >> http://visionmedia.github.io/mocha/. Looks nice as well. > > Mocha is nice but I would prefer that we use the same framework across all of JS. I imagine Luke scaffolded the app with Yeoman (could be wrong) and that pulled in mocha. I would prefer we stick with QUnit across the JS bits but feel free to try all 3 suggested as they are all good choices. >> >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Karel Piwko <kpiwko(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Yahor, >>>> >>>> QUnit or Jasmine is a pretty good choice. Aerogear uses QUnit from what >>>> I've >>>> seen so far and QE definitely goes QUnit :-) >>>> >>>> Karel >>>> >>>> [1] https://github.com/arquillian/arquillian-extension-qunit >>>> >>>> On Thu, 4 Jul 2013 13:07:33 +0300 >>>> Yahor Radtsevich <yradtsevich(a)exadel.com&gt; wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hello all! >>>>> >>>>> I am from the JBoss Tools team, and I am developing CordovaSim - a >>>>> simulator for Cordova-based hybrid projects. >>>>> Now we are looking for a framework for JavaScript testing. We are >>>> planning >>>>> to use it mostly to test various Cordova API methods. >>>>> >>>>> Which framework do you use in the Aerogear development? >>>>> >>>>> How about Jasmine? >>>>> >>>>> I will appreciate any suggestions. >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

On Jul 5, 2013, at 9:05 AM, Kris Borchers <kborcher(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > > On Jul 5, 2013, at 7:22, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > >> ummm, i did what now? > > I was just guessing about you using yeoman for the push admin app. It is > set up for mocha tests. Did you do that or was it pulled in for you? you guessed correct, yeoman did that for me, i haven't actually written any tests ;)

>> On Jul 4, 2013, at 10:25 AM, Kris Borchers <kborcher(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Jul 4, 2013, at 8:26, Karel Piwko <kpiwko(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, 4 Jul 2013 16:12:36 +0300 >>>> Yahor Radtsevich <yradtsevich(a)exadel.com&gt; wrote: >>>> >>>>> Thank you very much Karel! >>>>> >>>>> We will try both of them. >>>> >>>> I've just figured out that Luke is using Mocha - >>>> http://visionmedia.github.io/mocha/. Looks nice as well. >>> >>> Mocha is nice but I would prefer that we use the same framework across >>> all of JS. I imagine Luke scaffolded the app with Yeoman (could be wrong) >>> and that pulled in mocha. I would prefer we stick with QUnit across the >>> JS bits but feel free to try all 3 suggested as they are all good choices. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Karel Piwko <kpiwko(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Yahor, >>>>>> >>>>>> QUnit or Jasmine is a pretty good choice. Aerogear uses QUnit from what >>>>>> I've >>>>>> seen so far and QE definitely goes QUnit :-) >>>>>> >>>>>> Karel >>>>>> >>>>>> [1] https://github.com/arquillian/arquillian-extension-qunit >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, 4 Jul 2013 13:07:33 +0300 >>>>>> Yahor Radtsevich <yradtsevich(a)exadel.com&gt; wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hello all! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I am from the JBoss Tools team, and I am developing CordovaSim - a >>>>>>> simulator for Cordova-based hybrid projects. >>>>>>> Now we are looking for a framework for JavaScript testing. We are >>>>>> planning >>>>>>> to use it mostly to test various Cordova API methods. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Which framework do you use in the Aerogear development? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> How about Jasmine? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I will appreciate any suggestions. >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>>>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

I was just wondering about the possibility of an aerogear generator for yeoman with the libs recommended. Wdyt? We can file a jira for that - abstractj On Jul 4, 2013, 11:25 AM, Kris Borchers wrote: > > > On Jul 4, 2013, at 8:26, Karel Piwko <kpiwko(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > >> On Thu, 4 Jul 2013 16:12:36 +0300 >> Yahor Radtsevich <yradtsevich(a)exadel.com&gt; wrote: >> >>> Thank you very much Karel! >>> >>> We will try both of them. >> >> I've just figured out that Luke is using Mocha - >> http://visionmedia.github.io/mocha/. Looks nice as well. > > Mocha is nice but I would prefer that we use the same framework across all of JS. I imagine Luke scaffolded the app with Yeoman (could be wrong) and that pulled in mocha. I would prefer we stick with QUnit across the JS bits but feel free to try all 3 suggested as they are all good choices. >> >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Karel Piwko <kpiwko(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Yahor, >>>> >>>> QUnit or Jasmine is a pretty good choice. Aerogear uses QUnit from what >>>> I've >>>> seen so far and QE definitely goes QUnit :-) >>>> >>>> Karel >>>> >>>> [1] https://github.com/arquillian/arquillian-extension-qunit >>>> >>>> On Thu, 4 Jul 2013 13:07:33 +0300 >>>> Yahor Radtsevich <yradtsevich(a)exadel.com&gt; wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hello all! >>>>> >>>>> I am from the JBoss Tools team, and I am developing CordovaSim - a >>>>> simulator for Cordova-based hybrid projects. >>>>> Now we are looking for a framework for JavaScript testing. We are >>>> planning >>>>> to use it mostly to test various Cordova API methods. >>>>> >>>>> Which framework do you use in the Aerogear development? >>>>> >>>>> How about Jasmine? >>>>> >>>>> I will appreciate any suggestions. >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev