Hi, while WF 11.0 is not yet release, I'd like to see us getting on to WF 11 on the master branch http://wildfly.org/downloads/ I think that our master branch should be exclusively target the latest from WF stable, which is 11 in the future. So getting to know what's problematic w/ the WF 11-alpha series is a good thing. Comments ? -Matthias -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

Does make sense to update Keycloak so it doesn't fail? It seems to be a dependency issue. On 16 June 2017 at 13:16, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: > just tested alpha1, but our legacy keycloak is biting us: > > https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-2117 > > -M > > > > On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 1:16 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> while WF 11.0 is not yet release, I'd like to see us getting on to WF 11 >> on the master branch >> >> http://wildfly.org/downloads/ >> >> I think that our master branch should be exclusively target the latest >> from WF stable, which is 11 in the future. So getting to know what's >> problematic w/ the WF 11-alpha series is a good thing. >> >> Comments ? >> >> -Matthias >> >> -- >> Matthias Wessendorf >> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > -- JOSE MIGUEL GALLAS OLMEDO ASSOCIATE QE, mobile Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com/> M: +34618488633 <http://redhatemailsignature-marketing.itos.redhat.com/> <https://red.ht/sig> _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev