On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Summers Pittman <supittma(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > Hey guys, > > I'm trying to update the aerodoc Android cookbook example, but I can't > get the AeroDoc backend server running. Digging into the source it seems > pretty bitrotted (using picket link instead of keycloak, lucene doesn't > play nice with the wildfly docker image, dependencies are out of date, etc). > yes, that's a bit outdated, and we did try to get a GSoC student to be able to work on that project, regarding updates. But didn't get enough slots. > > Who knows about it and can give me a hand some time? > I can take a look tomorrow, perhaps at some point we should schedule some time to do an overhaul ourselves. > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

cool! Mind sending a PR for the 'containerization' of the backend? On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 7:04 PM, Summers Pittman <supittma(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > Good news, I got it working. Looks like Docker had some weird > permissions under the hood for lucene. I also had to edit the pom to get > dom4j loading correctly. > > On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 12:47 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; > wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Summers Pittman <supittma(a)redhat.com&gt; >> wrote: >> >>> Hey guys, >>> >>> I'm trying to update the aerodoc Android cookbook example, but I can't >>> get the AeroDoc backend server running. Digging into the source it seems >>> pretty bitrotted (using picket link instead of keycloak, lucene doesn't >>> play nice with the wildfly docker image, dependencies are out of date, etc). >>> >> >> yes, that's a bit outdated, and we did try to get a GSoC student to be >> able to work on that project, regarding updates. But didn't get enough >> slots. >> >> >> >> >>> >>> Who knows about it and can give me a hand some time? >>> >> >> I can take a look tomorrow, perhaps at some point we should schedule >> some time to do an overhaul ourselves. >> >> >> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Matthias Wessendorf >> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> > > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev