The JBoss repo is somewhat messy, yes. But so is central (new to you or
not), were they routinely allow artifacts to be moved around...
The JBoss repo was set up incorrectly as the person who manages it
eagerly agrees. Originally the "duplicates" were copied because JBoss
wanted (gasp) reproducibility to their AS builds; and since the maven
team allowed artifacts to be moved around after deployment that was not
really an option relying on stuff from central. But really what should
have been done was to have 2 JBoss repos: 1) for "duplicates" from
central and 2) one for JBoss published artifacts (hibernate et al).
That's actually what I am more interested in seeing happen.
On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 13:05 +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
> use jboss maven repository for jboss stuff.
>
> /max
As I have said several times on this list, the jboss maven repository is
sufficiently polluted with non-jboss artifacts with poor naming schemes
that conflict with central, and artifacts named the same as ones which
exist in central but which may or may not be the same, that I do not and
will not trust it.
And even if that were not the case, it is still convenient to have
everything available in central.
Max.
> Max Bowsher wrote:
>> With Hibernate Core 3.3.2 just released, it seems like a relevant time
>> to ask:
>>
>> What happened to the ongoing struggle to get jboss artifacts synced to
>> maven central?
>>
>> Could we please have an update of what the current status is?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Max.
_______________________________________________
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev --
Steve Ebersole <steve(a)hibernate.org>
Hibernate.org