Re: [hibernate-dev] [Search] proposing an alternative to depth in @IndexedEmbedded
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 14:26:35 +0200, Emmanuel Bernard
<emmanuel(a)hibernate.org> wrote:
On 22 août 2011, at 14:07, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
> Not sure if I like the surrogate Document idea. Maybe we can get rid of
> exposing any type
> of "Document". The bridge could just return a Field(able).
You can't do that. At least you need a (conceptual) Set<Fieldable>.
Sure.