On Aug 25, 2011, at 9:31 AM, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
It still conflicts with the actual default value of depth and that
there is
no explicit way to say that it is ignored. I don't think "it seems clear"
is a good enough reason.
That's reasonable. If everything is left in IndexEmbedded you are right that it is
basically mixing two different approaches into one annotation. The only other option I
could think of is having an autoConfig attribute vs. an explicitConfig on IndexEmbedded.
But that would require depth be moved into an 'autoConfig' annotation, which would
not be desirable.
Yes, one of these alternatives. Maybe the "one new
'exclude' attribute in
IndexEmbedded and one new annotation for IndexSubPaths"
That seems like the best fit, at the moment, as it eliminates any ambiguity.
Zach