Thanks Steve. So I guess that settles it for OGM as well?
(Removed all people from CC as we're changing subject)
-- Sanne
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 5:16 AM, Gunnar Morling <gunnar(a)hibernate.org>
wrote:
>
> 2014-03-31 12:08 GMT+02:00 Sanne Grinovero <sanne(a)hibernate.org>:
>
> > Since Hibernate OGM is now an implementation of JPA 2.1, doesn't it
> > already require Java 7?
> >
>
> Good point; Not sure whether JPA 2.1 per-se really requires Java 7, but I
> understand as an implementation we'd be "allowed" to require Java 7 as
per
> the spec guidelines. So far, 6 seemed sufficient for our purposes.
>
> You could also decide to use Java7 for the build but not necessarily
> > make use of Java7 features, as Search is an optional dependency. (but
> > I also don't see a problem on moving).
> >
>
> Yes, I thought about this as well, but it makes a difficult story to
> explain (depending on whether you use JP-QL or not, and depending on the
> backend you use, you may be use Java 6 or 7). I'd rather move to 7
> altogether then and keep things a bit simpler.
>
> >
> > I would like to encourage OGM to switch to Search 5 soon though: the
> > HQL parser is aligning already, and some features we're working on in
> > Search are meant to improve the user experience for OGM users
> > specifically (HSEARCH-1119), not least it's the version meant for
> > Infinispan 7, which OGM will need to support a GridDialect over
> > HotRod. And solid performance improvements as usual ;-)
> >
>
> +1 :-)
>
>
> >
> > -- Sanne
> >
> > On 31 March 2014 10:40, Gunnar Morling <gunnar(a)hibernate.org> wrote:
> > > +1
> > >
> > > One potential issue coming to mind is that this will require Hibernate
> > OGM
> > > users to work with Java 7 as well (at least when using queries via
> > Hibernate
> > > Search).
> > >
> > > When discussing the issue (for OGM) last time, we decided to stick to
> > Java 6
> > > to ease OGM experiments of existing Hibernate ORM users. Personally I
> > don't
> > > think it's a problem, (I had wished to move OGM to Java 7 before),
> > > just
> > > pointing out the fact so that there are no surprises.
> > >
> > > So once we upgrade OGM to HSEARCH 5.x, I'd then make use of Java 7
> > features
> > > in OGM as well.
> > >
> > > --Gunnar
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 2014-03-20 19:20 GMT+01:00 Hardy Ferentschik <hardy(a)hibernate.org>:
> > >
> > >> +100
> > >>
> > >> On 20 Jan 2014, at 16:21, Sanne Grinovero <sanne(a)hibernate.org>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > The next minor release of Apache Lucene v. 4.8 will require
Java7.
> > >> >
> > >> > The Lucene team has highlighted many good reasons for that,
> > >> > including
> > >> > some excellent improvements in sorting performance and
reliability
> > >> > of
> > >> > IO operations: nice things we'd like to take advantage of.
> > >> >
> > >> > Objections against baseling Hibernate Search 5 to *require* Java7
> > >> > too?
> > >> > We hardly have a choice, so objections better be good ;-)
> > >> >
> > >> > -- Sanne
> > >> > _______________________________________________
> > >> > hibernate-dev mailing list
> > >> > hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> > >> >
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> hibernate-dev mailing list
> > >> hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> > >>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
> > >
> > >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> hibernate-dev mailing list
> hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev