On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 15:17:51 +0200, Sanne Grinovero
<sanne.grinovero(a)gmail.com> wrote:
So we still load the class, and also try to invoke it's default
constructor, but if we fail we try loading the alternative.
Ok, and that implies that we actually rename the "alternative"
implementations.
I guess this could work as well. It might be the best solution in case we
go for
the renaming of packages, but I am still not convinced that we should go
for it
(the renaming).