On Apr 13, 2012, at 12:16 AM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
Gunnar, it is largely irrelevant based on the legal expertise we have
been given by Red Hat.
But if you are going to keep up with it (and I think there is value to
that, and do it myself still) generally the year should just be touched
for non-trivial updates. A range is good. Simply updating the year to
the current year is fine. Listing years of all such non-trivial
updates is yet another good approach. Personally I tend to just update
the year.
+1 My preference is also to just update the year.
--Hardy