Hey Guillaume,
I think I have properly fixed the issue. Can you test and review the
pull request
?
Sanne it would be useful for you to check it out too.
Emmanuel
On Tue 2012-09-25 9:58, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
Let me investigate this further first. Ideally the engine would use
the right column names ie the fk and not the ones from the entity ids.
I must have messed up when I fixed the bug I discussed with you.
On 24 sept. 2012, at 20:20, Guillaume SCHEIBEL <guillaume.scheibel(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm working on OGM-236 which consists to use by default the IN_ENTITY mode
> for association storage strategy instead of COLLECTION.
> I've just found out a little issue, when we use @JoinColumns over a
> @OneToMany property to map an @EmbeddedID with the IN_ENTITY mode, the
> navigation information are not stored directly into the document itself but
> another document composed by the join columns as the _id and the navigation
> information (in that case the IDs that the entity is related to).
>
> Concretely, let's starting from this mapping:
>
https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate-ogm/blob/master/hibernate-ogm-core...
>
https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate-ogm/blob/master/hibernate-ogm-core...
>
https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate-ogm/blob/master/hibernate-ogm-core...
>
> and run this test with the IN_ENTITY mode on (to make the switch, a
> modification into MongoDBDatastoreProvider.configure() is needed)
>
https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate-ogm/blob/master/hibernate-ogm-core...
>
>
> We can expect to have something like:
>
> {
> "_id": {
> "author": "Guillaume",
> "title": "There are more than 20 JUGs in France"
> },
> "content": "Great! Congratulations folks",
> "labels": [
>
> { "id": NumberLong(5) }
>
> ]
>
> }
>
> It means this News is related to 1 Label of which ID is 5.
> But due to @JoinColumns we got this (both documents are from the News
> collection):
>
> {
> "_id": {
> "author": "Guillaume",
> "title": "There are more than 20 JUGs in France"
> },
> "content": "Great! Congratulations folks",
> "labels": []
> } {
> "_id": {
> "news_author_fk": "Guillaume",
> "news_topic_fk": "There are more than 20 JUGs in France"
> },
> "labels": [{
> "id": NumberLong(5)
> }]
> }
>
> Of course at the loading, when the News seems not related to any Label
> because the "labels" field is empty.
> A workaround it to change the @JoinColumns from:
>
> @JoinColumns({@JoinColumn(name="news_topic_fk", referencedColumnName =
> "newsid.title", nullable = false) ,
> @JoinColumn(name="news_author_fk", referencedColumnName =
> "newsid.author", nullable = false)})
> private List<Label> labels;
>
> @JoinColumns({@JoinColumn(name="title", referencedColumnName =
> "newsid.title", nullable = false) ,
> @JoinColumn(name="author", referencedColumnName =
> "newsid.author", nullable = false)})
> private List<Label> labels;
>
> Note that the new value of each @JoinColumn's name is the same as
> referenced property from the @Embedded entity.
>
> I see there are 2 fix possible for this issue:
> - we can say in case of IN_ENTITY mode don't use @JoinColumns' name to
> store the navigation property but the property from the referenced
> column.
> - at the loading, we can check also the documents created due to @JoinColumns
>
> Personally, I would tend to the first approach which is more natural
> in terms of storage and more readable.
>
> What do you think ?
> Let me know if you need more information.
>
> Guillaume
> _______________________________________________
> hibernate-dev mailing list
> hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
_______________________________________________
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev