November 2006 - hibernate-dev - Jboss List Archives

hibernate-hsqldb-testsuite Build Completed With Testsuite Errors

by qa＠jboss.com

17 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

hibernate-sybase-testsuite Build Timed Out

by qa＠jboss.com

17 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

hibernate-hsqldb-testsuite Build Completed With Testsuite Errors

by qa＠jboss.com

17 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

hibernate-sybase-testsuite Build Timed Out

by qa＠jboss.com

17 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

hibernate-mysql-testsuite Build Timed Out

by qa＠jboss.com

17 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

hibernate-mysql-testsuite Build Completed With Testsuite Errors

by qa＠jboss.com

17 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

hibernate-sybase-testsuite Build Completed With Testsuite Errors

by qa＠jboss.com

17 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

hibernate-hsqldb-testsuite Build Completed With Testsuite Errors

by qa＠jboss.com

17 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

Hibernate Lucene: What's next

by Emmanuel Bernard

Hi again, Here are some ideas I have in mind for Hibernate Lucene o User feedback First and most important, I need and will use user feedback on the changes: Usability, Use case coverage, etc I know our model work well for non complex querying requirement, I would like to see it evolving to enhance flexibility to cope with more complex ones. The design of Hibernate Lucene tries to not hide the Lucene APIs LuceneSession currecly use the delegation pattern, is it OK any better idea? Right now you have to do new LuceneSession(session); o More built-in types I want to increase the number of built in types, speak up! o Distributed Directory(Provider) Using JBossCache as a distributed Lucene Directory is something I have in mind. o Distributed read / centralized update Push the indexing work to a centralized machine and do in asynchronously. This is a fairly common architectural practice for Lucene. o Analyzer Today we have one analyzer per DirectoryProvider. This is most likely too coarse grained o Better integration of the bridge system and the query mechanism A subclass of the lucene QueryParser might be a good candidate to hook into some params translation between the user view and the index view Alternatively, query parameters is a good candidate o Filtered Lucene query (Ales idea) Apply filters on all elements queried through lucene, basically an additional BooleanQuery to the initial query o More access to the Lucene information When a query is executed by Lucene, you can have access to: - the number of results - the normalized score of a given document It might be interesting to give access to this information o Use of the lucene index to build the object (ie avoid DB access) http://www.mail-archive.com/hibernate-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg0601... o Default QueryParser Right now you need a query parser, to create a lucene query than pass this query to the luceneSession. This need to be simplified in the default cases Some additional elements are available on JIRA. Look for opened issues on HibernateAnnotation/lucene o Name you needed feature here...

17 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

Hibernate Lucene massive rework

by Emmanuel Bernard

Hi all, I have had time to work on Hibernate Lucene recently and finished the work I wanted to do. This is a major rework and will bring both API and index breaks, but for the good. This implements the core ideas that were floating around for a while. *What's new *o Index querying Keeping the index uptodate is nice, but querying it is even better. A LuceneSession has been introduced (a wrapper of an Hibernate session). You can now create a lucene query and get managed object back. luceneSession.createLuceneQuery(luceneQuery).list(); //get all matching entities initialize all entities one by one: setting a sensitive batch-size is critical future evolution: use of the Hibernate Core fetch profile once it is exposed to the user luceneSession.createLuceneQuery(luceneQuery, Book.class, Clock.class).iterate(); //get all matching entities of a given type iterate() read all the lucene index but initialize the entities on demand luceneSession.createLuceneQuery(luceneQuery).scroll(); //use scrollable resultset to maximize performance when a subset i needed. scroll() keep the index opened (Hits) and let you wald through it, this methods is the most IO/memory efficient do not forget to close the Scrollable Resultset All three query methods support setFirstResult/setMaxResult. As a matter of fact, the LuceneQuery return is an implementation of org.hibernate.Query, so your code is unaware of Lucene o object (re)indexation. You can now index an object, even if you do not apply any change on it. The index operation is batched to maximize speed. (luceneSession.index()): If no tx is in progress, the indexing is done immediately, otherwise the operations are batched and done right after the transaction commit. o FieldBridge Like the Hibernate UserType, a FieldBridge is an interface aiming to do the translation work between a property and it's indexed (ie String) representation. This interface is very flexible and even allows you to map a property into several index fields. For the simple cases: ie most cases, a StringBridge has been introduced, it convert your property into a String to be indexed. The API is much simpler to implement, so I expect most of the custom bridge to use this approach o Built-in bridges There is a built-in support for Date (with resolution), Numbers (ie java.lang.Number and its subclasses), and String. I'm willing to expand the support, please tell me what you need o New event listener / lucene interaction The Event listener has been reimplemented. It is now threadsafe (ie it does not depends on the underlying Directory locking mechanism - in a single VM). It fixes a flaw in the previous implementation that indexed entities even when the transaction was rollbacked (yuk!). You should no longer use the post-commit-* events but the post-* events, If no tx is in progress, the indexing is done immediately, otherwise the operations are done right after the transaction commit. This reimplementation opens the doors to: - a better batching system (need some adjustments in Hibernate Core) - the ability to delegate the actual indexation to a remote machine (through JMS or any other messaging mechanism). I say 'opens the doors' because the actual implementation is not there yet (but is not hard I think). o New annotations First of all the project has be repackaged, the annotations are now all under org.hibernate.lucene.annotations Second, the previous annotations have been deprecated to align with the Lucene 2.0 APIs @DocumentId and @Field() are now to be used. The old ones are still here but will be removed in a future release You can also annotate a property to use a custom field bridge (@FieldBridge) and inject parameters @DateBridge allows you do define the resolution (YEAR, MONTH, ...) of a Date to be indexed @Boost can be defined on an entity and on a property o Support for annotated fields Only annotated properties were supported, you now can annotate fields as well o indexing As described earlier, the interaction with Lucene has been reworked to allow better efficiency. Several entities per index, as well a class hierarchy indexing is now supported o DirectoryProvider Still present a pluggable directory provider with 2 default implementations (Memory and File system). *When do we get it and Feedbacks?* I expect to release all this right after Hibernate Core 3.2.1 and as soon as I update the documentation. Please have a look at the API and the feature set. Nothing is cast in stone yet. I'll follow up with a What's next email. Can I have a preview? Yes, you can get the code from http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/hibernate/branches/Lucene_Integration/ (you need too get Hibernate Core from trunk of branch_3_2 I also have uploaded a snapshot version of the javadoc http://www.hibernate.org/~emmanuel/lucenesnapshot20061102/doc/api/ check for the org.hibernate.lucene.* packages Question: Should it be part of the Hibernate Annotation 3.2.x series? Hibernate Lucene is considered experimental (ie still evolving). It does break the applications using Hibernate Lucene right now, but the migration will bring a big plus. If I release it as part of the 3.3.x series that binds me to a Core release and will delay the adoption. Maybe it is time for a separate package (event if I don't think this will really solve the problem)

17 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

hibernate-dev November 2006