> 3)//TODO set a serial number
> May I auto-generate a serialVersionUID for classes were missing,
> or do you have some special policy about them I should be aware of?
I never understood that part of Java, you are free to go :)
Please just remember that just because tools (like eclipse and others) warns about a
missing serialversionUID it
does not mean it should be there. Simon Kicthing described it well in HBX-444:
"When you declare a serialVersionUID you're also declaring that you are aware of
all the issues regarding serialising one version of a class and reimporting the serialized
data into a different version of the class, and are promising to update the
serialVersionUID whenever you make an *incompatible* change to the class.
However most people don't have a clue what is and what is not a
serialization-incompatible-change to a class. In this situation I think the default
behaviour (which is that the serialization mechanism declares incompatibility if *any*
change occurs to the class) is much safer than having an auto-generated serialVersionUID
on the class resulting in potientially corrupted objects on deserialization."
Just my 2 cents...
-max