You mean like this[1]? Or something more?
[1]
http://docs.jboss.org/hibernate/core/3.6/quickstart/en-US/html/hibernate-
gsg-obtain.html#hibernate-gsg-setup-mavenRepoArtifacts
On Monday, October 11, 2010 02:20:11 am Sanne Grinovero wrote:
People loving uber-jars are (in my experience) those who don't
have an
automated dependency management system,
so having special maven artifacts won't help them.
It could be useful to document what modules are needed for each use
case by providing short descriptions for each jar.
Sanne
2010/10/11 Steve Ebersole <steve(a)hibernate.org>:
> That would work sure. But each combination would require an artifact in
> this scheme. And that's a lot of combinations.
>
> On Sunday, October 10, 2010 03:29:03 pm Adam Warski wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> > As far as I know, the only way to do what you suggest with Maven would
>> > be for us to develop an archetype. The problem with these imho is
>> > that you rarely are developing a "hibernate application"; more
>> > usually you are developing a "web application", within which you
are
>> > using hibernate. So you need to decide up front which archetype you
>> > want to use. Its just very inflexible.
>>
>> What about a maven artifact (afaik gardle and ivy also use maven
>> repositories for dependencies), which only contains dependencies to
>> other hibernate modules (the ones that are before went into the
>> uber-jar and are not transitive deps of the hibernate core artifact)?
>
> --
> Steve Ebersole <steve(a)hibernate.org>
>
http://hibernate.org
> _______________________________________________
> hibernate-dev mailing list
> hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
--
Steve Ebersole <steve(a)hibernate.org>
http://hibernate.org