It actually works perfectly with ant. IntelliJ works nice to with
cross module dependency. Doesn't eclipse support cross module
dependencies?
On 15 févr. 07, at 06:33, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
> validator
> lib (empty)
> compile depends on jpa-api, commons-annotations, core
> compiletest depends on annotations //DDL integration, will
> depend on jpa //JPA integration
>
> annotations
> lib (empty)
> compile depends on jpa-api, validator, commons-annotations, core
> //want to add a dependency to search for ease of use
> compiletest depends on nothing more
I did not notice this until I actually tried to put this into eclipse.
You have a dependency cycle here - annotations needs validator, but
validator
(it's tests at least) cannot be compiled without annotations...
I can probably solve this by putting a compiled annotations on the
classpath of validator
but that is so yucky! :(
/max
> jpa
> lib (jboss-archive-browser)
> compile depends on jpa-api, validator, commons-annotations,
> annotations, core
> compiletest depends on nothing more
>
>
> Dependencies are managed by the building system automatically. The
> way it is done is a hack in the build.xml files (no clean
> encapsulation), but it deals nicely with compilation dependencies
> vs test compilation dependencies: it could be improved by
> implementing a specific ant task. The build looks for the
> availability of the jar dependencies, and if not present clean,
> jar is called on this dependency project
> Alternatively, Ivy looks very promising and quite lightweight in
> the way dependencies are handled, so we could use it: no rush
> though, since the job is done and there won't be much dependency
> changes.
>
> The nice thing about it is that there is no more lib/* duplication
> (most are shared)
>
> I still need to tackle with the dist task and copy the dependency
> libraries instead.
>
> Aside from the build changes:
> - commons-annotations is now independent with no dependencies
> - validator still depend on core (it is actually hard not to),
> but it can work fine without HAN, you can use it with a plain JPA
> engine.
> - search is independent of HAN, per se but not from core, it
> could be easily though I think and we could support plain JPA
> engines as well.
>
> A few remaining questions:
> - HAN as an integration project
> Should Hibernate Annotations embed search and validator jars, I
> think so as third party jars, it would make the full blend HAN
> usage smoother (like event listener auto configuration)
> The idea is to embed a reference version of validator and search
> in HAN with he ability for a user to upgrade validator or search
> for a given HAN version
>
> - Version number
> I am in favor of keeping the version number root 3.2.2. Hibernate
> Search however is still beta, so a different versioning would be
> better 3.2.2.beta1 and so on (3.2.2.beta2 or 3.2.3.beta1).
>
> - Documentation
> Since Validator and Search will be integrated to HAN, should I
> keep the chapters in both the HAN doc and the validator doc?
>
> I plan to apply that sometimes this week (tomorrow hopefully).
> Once I'm done we'll be able to think about the website changes.
> Comments welcome before I commit that work.
> _______________________________________________
> hibernate-dev mailing list
> hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
--
--
Max Rydahl Andersen
callto://max.rydahl.andersen
Hibernate
max(a)hibernate.org
http://hibernate.org
JBoss a division of Red Hat
max.andersen(a)jboss.com