Re: [hibernate-dev] WildFly 10 + Hibernate ORM 5 integration status update...

That should still be ok. If it does not work, that would be a bug. On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 11:38 AM Sanne Grinovero <sanne(a)hibernate.org <mailto:sanne@hibernate.org>> wrote: On 18 June 2015 at 17:17, Scott Marlow <smarlow(a)redhat.com <mailto:smarlow@redhat.com>> wrote: > > > On 06/18/2015 11:59 AM, Sanne Grinovero wrote: >> >> On 18 June 2015 at 15:55, Scott Marlow <smarlow(a)redhat.com <mailto:smarlow@redhat.com>> wrote: >>> >>> Sanne, >>> >>> The [1] pull request to bring Jipijapa source into WildFly master is >>> merged. >>> >>> I pushed a copy of the (work in progress) ORM 5 changes to github [2]. >>> >>> Is there a WildFly pull request for the changes to upgrade to Hibernate >>> Search 5.4.0.Alpha1? I didn't see one but I might of missed it. >> >> >> No there isn't, as Hibernate Search 5.4.0.Alpha1 *requires* Hibernate >> ORM 5.0.0.CR1. > > > What needs to change on WildFly for the Hibernate Search upgrade? Nothing else changes. Just change the Hibernate Search version when you change the Hibernate ORM version. > I started > with just changing the WildFly (top level) pom.xml to reference HS > 5.4.0.Alpha1. +1 > Do you expect that the latest ORM master branch will work > with HS 5.4.0.Alpha1 or is ORM 5.0.0.CR1 better? I didn't test the latest ORM master branch, but it will work with ORM 5.0.0.CR1. > Locally, I am building the latest ORM master (built from source) and using > Hibernate Search 5.4.0.Alpha1. When running the WildFly testsuite, I see a > few different errors. One of them is from the > HibernateSearchJPATestCase.testFullTextQuery test. > http://pastebin.com/Q5xLrkpT shows the WildFly server.log contents from the > Hibernate Search test. That looks like related to an Hibernate ORM change, not Search. The entity used for that test doesn't declare the fields as "public"; that used to be ok in previous versions. You could workaround it by changing the test to use either public fields or traditional getters/setters? But we should check with Steve if that change was intentional? For now, better to workaround it in the test so we don't get stuck. Thanks! Sanne > > >> >> The two should be updated in synch this time, in future there will be >> more flexibility. >> >>> >>> Scott >>> >>> [1] https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly/pull/7509 >>> >>> [2] https://github.com/scottmarlow/wildfly/tree/hibernate5_june18 _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev