So, to summarise all of this. What I suggest is this:
- Short term:
The "quick fix" I suggest in
http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/infinispan-dev/2012-March/010317.html
Do we want to try this (requires a new build of Infinispan I think)? Or
should applications workaround the issue until we can reach the
medium/long term?
- Medium term:
Have a way to pass in marshalling configurations per cache manager and per-cache (or an
abstraction of it), which allows the right class resolver to be passed in. (***)
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-1367
ISPN-1367 is targeted to Infinispan 5.2, any idea of the target release
date for that? I'm curious as to which AS release it might align with.
- Long term:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-1413
(***) I still don't fully understand how web apps don't have the same issue as
2LC of not seeing Infinispan classes (Reminder: we're not talking about the contents
of the cache, but about the Infinispan classes themselves).
On Mar 6, 2012, at 8:19 PM, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
>
> On Mar 6, 2012, at 8:06 PM, David M. Lloyd wrote:
>
>> On 03/06/2012 01:02 PM, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
>>> On Mar 6, 2012, at 6:31 PM, Paul Ferraro wrote:
>>> </snip>
>>>> To work around this, we typically store MarshalledValues in the cache -
which are marshalled/unmarshalled using a marshalling configuration specific to the
application (e.g. via a ModularClassResolver using the ModuleLoader of the deployment
unit).
>>>>
https://github.com/jbossas/jboss-as/blob/master/clustering/api/src/main/j...
>>>>
https://github.com/jbossas/jboss-as/blob/master/clustering/api/src/main/j...
>>>>
https://github.com/jbossas/jboss-as/blob/master/clustering/api/src/main/j...
>>>
>>> Isn't a class resolver and a class loader, functionality wise, doing the
same thing? I wonder if a custom classloader could not be built that delegates to a
ModularClassResolver...
>>
>> No, not really. A class loader loads a class, given a name. But a
>> class resolver loads a class given a name *and* stream information. The
>> modular class resolver reads the stream information to know which class
>> loader houses the class in question. This is critically important
>> because it's possible (common even) for more than one class to exist in
>> an AS instance with the same name. And there is no single class loader
>> which has visibility to all classes which could potentially be stored in
>> a cache.
>>
>> Yes, accepting a class loader to use is a powerful feature. However it
>> *should* just be a convenience abstraction over a more fundamental
>> feature which allows a class resolver to be set.
>
> Thanks for the clarification, makes sense.
>
> So, if I understand this correctly, Infinispan should really be enhanced to accept
global and per-cache class resolvers, or more globally, as paul suggested below,
marshalling configuration instances (or abstractions of them).
>
> I think
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-1367 should be reporpoused to do this.
>
>>
>>>> So, essentially Infinispan itself only ever has to marshal/unmarshal a
byte[] wrapper - so the AS has full control over the marshalling process.
>>>>
>>>> I would recommend that the 2LC do something similar, and include a
mechanism for providing a MarshallingConfiguration per persistence unit.
>>>
>>> Possibly…
>>>
>>> --
>>> Galder Zamarreño
>>> Sr. Software Engineer
>>> Infinispan, JBoss Cache
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> - DML
>> _______________________________________________
>> infinispan-dev mailing list
>> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>
> --
> Galder Zamarreño
> Sr. Software Engineer
> Infinispan, JBoss Cache
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
--
Galder Zamarreño
Sr. Software Engineer
Infinispan, JBoss Cache
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev