Re: [hibernate-dev] ScrollableResults and 6.0
It sounds great but I'm not sure it's possible?
For example how would this handle projections? I guess it's a similar
doubt as the one Gunnar shared, but while he suggests a semi-typesafe
solution, I'm not sure how cool it is to give the feeling that types
are being checked when they might actually blow at runtime, if the
query string doesn't match expectations.
Could an Annotation Processor verify the declared return types really
match the HQL select?
Assuming the answer is no, I'd prefer the return types to explicitly
highlight the need for casting by using "Object[]": I suspect errors
leading to a type mismatch would produce more understandable errors.
On 2 January 2017 at 14:09, Steve Ebersole <steve(a)hibernate.org> wrote:
I knew of the request. Its just that on the EE group I am sure the
decision will be consistency.
On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 7:11 AM Yoann Rodiere <yoann(a)hibernate.org> wrote:
> > Regarding JPA adopting scrolling as a feature, what I suggest simply
> follows what Hibernate ans JPA already do for other Query returns. Today
> it is completely inconsistent between Query#scroll and Query#list e.g.. I
> am just suggesting making that consistent.
>
> Sure. I just wanted to point out that scrolling isn't part of JPA yet, but
> there are plans to add it, so we might as well try to know what form it
> will take in JPA 2.2 in order to make the change future-proof.
>
> To be perfectly clear: it was just a heads-up because I came accross this
> JPA ticket a few weeks ago, I don't have any specific concern in mind. If
> you think it's not relevant, sorry for the noise.
>
>
> Yoann Rodière <yoann(a)hibernate.org>
> Hibernate NoORM Team
>
> On 2 January 2017 at 12:42, Steve Ebersole <steve(a)hibernate.org> wrote:
>
> org.hibernate.query.Query extends javax.persistence.TypedQuery since 5.2,
> so it already has been parameterized.
>
> Regarding JPA adopting scrolling as a feature, what I suggest simply
> follows what Hibernate ans JPA already do for other Query returns. Today
> it is completely inconsistent between Query#scroll and Query#list e.g.. I
> am just suggesting making that consistent.
>
> On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 2:36 AM Yoann Rodiere <yoann(a)hibernate.org> wrote:
>
> For what it's worth, changing the signature indeed seems appropriate to
> me: the fewer object arrays, the better.
> Your proposal would require making Query parameterized too, though. I'm
> not really up-to-date with the current state of 6.0, but I guess it's
> already done or being done.
>
> Anyway, the only think I wanted to say was: if we break the API, maybe we
> should try to make sure we won't have to break it again soon. There has
> been some discussions about adding scrolling to the JPA spec:
> https://java.net/jira/browse/JPA_SPEC-89 . Maybe it would be worth it to
> ask for advice on this ticket, so as to limit the risk of having to break
> this API again, because the spec would introduce an incompatible signature?
> Not sure there would be many reactions, judging by the low activity on the
> ticket, but who knows...
>
> Yoann Rodière <yoann(a)hibernate.org>
> Hibernate NoORM Team
>
> On 27 December 2016 at 22:02, Steve Ebersole <steve(a)hibernate.org> wrote:
>
> FWIW my inclination is to just change the existing signatures. 6.0 is a
> major release with major changes already wrt querying.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 3:01 PM Steve Ebersole <steve(a)hibernate.org>
> wrote:
>
> > For 6.0 I'd like to also make ScrollableResults parameterized wrt the
> "row
> > type". E.g.
> >
> > ScrollableResults<Person> sr = session.createQuery( ..., Person.class
> > ).scroll();
> >
> > However that changes the signature of its methods returning a "row"
> > (currently always defined as Object[]).
> >
> > How would everyone prefer we handle this? Do I just change the
> signatures
> > of the existing methods? Or add new methods?
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> hibernate-dev mailing list
> hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev