Re: [hibernate-dev] [Search] proposing an alternative to depth in @IndexedEmbedded

On Aug 30, 2011, at 11:40 AM, Sanne Grinovero wrote: > Yes I understood that was your suggestions; but I think that using > @IndexEmbedded(depth=0, {IndexPath1, IndexPath2}) > would get you exactly what you wanted? Ahh gotcha. I misunderstood. Yes that works for me. > > Just that I can still use for example depth=1 combined with some paths > to mean "all of depth 1, plus these extra paths we hand-picked". Putting what you said(which I agree with) into example form: @IndexEmbedded(depth=3, paths={"a.b.c.d.e"}) Would index everything up to depth 3. Additionally index a.b.c.d.e, which exceeds depth of 3. > This flexibility seems handy to me, and makes the two features > compatible (not conflicting in any meaning), to the point that IMHO > they don't need new annotations. Yeah this is much better. Thanks for clarifying. ZK