Re: [hibernate-dev] HHH-10487 - @Incubating annotation

I would think that such a tool would work at compile time rather than reflectively at runtime, but one can't be sure of course so it depends on what you have in mind. I'd also say make @Incubating with CLASS retention, it's more than what people had before.. you can always evolve it later if someone come with a brilliant use case which requires more. On 29 January 2016 at 18:06, Steve Ebersole <steve(a)hibernate.org&gt; wrote: > I personally do not in terms of usage from ORM, nor in usage by ORM users > either. I do wonder about tooling though. Like would it be useful for a > tool to see an implementation of an @Incubating contract being used and > warn the user? > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016, 12:02 PM Gunnar Morling <gunnar(a)hibernate.org&gt; wrote: > >> Do you see any use case for accessing it reflectively at runtime? >> >> FWIW, OGM's @Experimental has CLASS retention, which I think is >> "enough retention" for its purpose. >> >> 2016-01-29 18:50 GMT+01:00 Steve Ebersole <steve(a)hibernate.org&gt;: >> > Per HHH-10487[1], I want to add an @Incubating annotation to mark APIs >> that >> > are still incubating. Specifically, what do y'all think of >> > `java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy#CLASS` versus >> > `java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy#RUNTIME`? >> > >> > [1] https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HHH-10487 >> > _______________________________________________ >> > hibernate-dev mailing list >> > hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev >> > _______________________________________________ > hibernate-dev mailing list > hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev