Well thats the beauty of duplicating (in theory). Nothing really to
fight. Now if we were doing relocation, yes I'd agree with you :)
On 08/27/2013 10:28 AM, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
On Tue 2013-08-27 10:22, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> On Tue 27 Aug 2013 10:16:38 AM CDT, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
>> +1 to have a suffix not related tot he draft. Like you I have pushed
>> spec jars that did not reflect eh state of a draft necessarily.
>>
>> BTW, why retrofit that scheme? Why not just apply it for 2.1?
> Well applying it for 2.1 is in fact retrofitting it too. I have
> already pushed the 2.1 "Final". As for why 1.0 and 2.0 also, I just
> like consistency; it makes me happy :)
>
If that makes you happy to fight Nexus, that makes me happy to watch you
;)