Cool. Yes go ahead on 530.
Thanks Sanne
On 22 juil. 2010, at 16:50, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
2010/7/22 Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel(a)hibernate.org>:
> Looks like a good candidate for back port indeed.
> Add the 3.2.1 version to the existing bug, that's the easiest solution.
Hi, I merged HSEARCH-534 in the the 3.2 branch.
If you agree with it I could spend some minutes to merge HSEARCH-530
too, I don't see more interesting issues.
Sanne
>
> On 22 juil. 2010, at 00:47, Sanne Grinovero <sanne.grinovero(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> maybe HSEARCH-534 could be considered: non-intrusive change, nasty bug too.
>> What's the procedure? I suppose 1) edit "fix versions" to add the
>> 3.2.1 2) merge the changeset in the branch
>> or should we also open a new issue, or reopen the same one?
>>
>> 2010/7/19 Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel(a)hibernate.org>:
>>> Since 3.3 is not out yet (likely an end of summer target), I'm thinking
on releasing a maintenance version of the 3.2 series.
>>> HSEARCH-540 is a pretty nasty bug (due to lack of Synchronization execution
ordering - see Re: [hibernate-dev] Exceptions thrown in a tx synchronization are eaten by
Steve on July 14th).
>>>
>>> Any other bug you think cannot wait and should be back-ported?
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> hibernate-dev mailing list
>>> hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>>>
>