Re: [hibernate-dev] jpa api jar name

Well we can also do what you suggest and you can be the one fielding bug reports about some other providers jar if you wish ;) On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 17:38 +0100, Emmanuel Bernard wrote: > If you guys like that. But you will be the ones answering the questions: > - why is Hibernate not standard > - why do I need an hibernate specific jar to use JPA 2 > :) > > On 14 déc. 2009, at 16:02, Hardy Ferentschik wrote: > >> I like the idea of having 'hibernate' in the actual jar name as well. When you are >> building a project the dependencies are clear. But when you just look at an artifact >> like for example a war file it helps a lot if the jar file names are a little more descriptive. >> We also have hibernate-core and not jut core. >> >> >> --Hardy >> >> >> On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 11:36:19 -0300, Steve Ebersole <steve(a)hibernate.org&gt; wrote: >> >>> When the user simply has the jar file "in hand". >>> >>> On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 15:30 +0100, Emmanuel Bernard wrote: >>>> Since jpa-api is not a standard name, people will search >>>> javax.persistence and they will see the group is prefix. >>>> When is the artifactID not next to the groupId? I don't remember where >>>> that could happen in ivy or maven but I am no expert here. >>>> >>>> On 14 déc. 2009, at 15:22, Steve Ebersole wrote: >>>> >>>>> I am thinking of users here. Since there will be multiple jpa api >>>>> jars out there I liked the idea of the jar name itself encoding the >>>>> fact that this is the one from hibernate. I think this is more user >>>>> friendly. I hear what you are saying though about the ability to >>>>> bootstrap any/all providers. >>>>> >>>>> -- Sent from my Palm Prē >>>>> >>>>> steve(a)hibernate.org >>>>> http://hibernate.org >>>>> ____________________________________________________________________ >>>>> Emmanuel Bernard wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I would use >>>>> org.hibernate.javax.persistence:jpa-2.0-api:1.0.0-SNAPSHOT >>>>> >>>>> Because while there is code written by us, it's not specific to >>>>> Hibernate and can bootstrap all providers on the market. >>>>> >>>>> On 11 déc. 2009, at 22:24, Steve Ebersole wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Of course that should be >>>>>> >>>>> org.hibernate.javax.persistence:hibernate-jpa-2.0-api:1.0.0-SNAPSHOT >>>>>> >>>>>> ;) >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 14:59 -0600, Steve Ebersole wrote: >>>>>>> I think there is a consensus we need to rename our JPA api jar. >>>>> The >>>>>>> main concern is that we should be capturing the spec version in >>>>> the >>>>>>> artifact name but that the versioning should be its own thing >>>>> since >>>>>>> there is in fact Hibernate specific code in the classes that we >>>>> will >>>>>>> have need to maintain and release independently. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I propose the following naming: >>>>>>> >>>>> org.hibernate.javax.persistence:hibernate-jpa-2.1-api:1.0.0-SNAPSHOT >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Unless I hear different options I will make this change this >>>>> weekend. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> At that time I will also publish a release of it as 1.0.0-CR-1 >>>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Steve Ebersole <steve(a)hibernate.org&gt; >>>>>> Hibernate.org >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> hibernate-dev mailing list >>>>>> hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev >>>>> >>>> >>>> >> > -- Steve Ebersole <steve(a)hibernate.org&gt; Hibernate.org