out of curiosity, why not drop org.hibernate?
javax.persistence:jpa-2.0-api:1.0.0-SNAPSHOT
are there more api vendors ?
Cheers,
Sanne
2009/12/14 Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel(a)hibernate.org>:
I would use
org.hibernate.javax.persistence:jpa-2.0-api:1.0.0-SNAPSHOT
Because while there is code written by us, it's not specific to Hibernate and can
bootstrap all providers on the market.
On 11 déc. 2009, at 22:24, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> Of course that should be
> org.hibernate.javax.persistence:hibernate-jpa-2.0-api:1.0.0-SNAPSHOT
>
> ;)
>
> On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 14:59 -0600, Steve Ebersole wrote:
>> I think there is a consensus we need to rename our JPA api jar. The
>> main concern is that we should be capturing the spec version in the
>> artifact name but that the versioning should be its own thing since
>> there is in fact Hibernate specific code in the classes that we will
>> have need to maintain and release independently.
>>
>> I propose the following naming:
>> org.hibernate.javax.persistence:hibernate-jpa-2.1-api:1.0.0-SNAPSHOT
>>
>> Unless I hear different options I will make this change this weekend.
>>
>> At that time I will also publish a release of it as 1.0.0-CR-1
>>
> --
> Steve Ebersole <steve(a)hibernate.org>
>
Hibernate.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> hibernate-dev mailing list
> hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
_______________________________________________
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev