2010/7/22 Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel(a)hibernate.org>:
Looks like a good candidate for back port indeed.
Add the 3.2.1 version to the existing bug, that's the easiest solution.
Hi, I merged HSEARCH-534 in the the 3.2 branch.
If you agree with it I could spend some minutes to merge HSEARCH-530
too, I don't see more interesting issues.
Sanne
On 22 juil. 2010, at 00:47, Sanne Grinovero <sanne.grinovero(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
> maybe HSEARCH-534 could be considered: non-intrusive change, nasty bug too.
> What's the procedure? I suppose 1) edit "fix versions" to add the
> 3.2.1 2) merge the changeset in the branch
> or should we also open a new issue, or reopen the same one?
>
> 2010/7/19 Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel(a)hibernate.org>:
>> Since 3.3 is not out yet (likely an end of summer target), I'm thinking on
releasing a maintenance version of the 3.2 series.
>> HSEARCH-540 is a pretty nasty bug (due to lack of Synchronization execution
ordering - see Re: [hibernate-dev] Exceptions thrown in a tx synchronization are eaten by
Steve on July 14th).
>>
>> Any other bug you think cannot wait and should be back-ported?
>> _______________________________________________
>> hibernate-dev mailing list
>> hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>>