So for today's meeting, jbott has still not ended the meeting. And
that was 4 hours ago. At least it has not responded with the URLs. Is
it still going?
On Tue 21 Jan 2014 09:11:08 AM CST, Steve Ebersole wrote:
The issue with slowness of ending the meeting was annoying yes.
Thanks for finding that.
The other issue is that jbott is sometimes just not there. It drops
off quite a bit. To give you a flavor, here is its drops from just
yesterday:
01:44 *** jbott <jbott!supybot@nat/redhat/x-kcdixxnxtyoqqrjn> has quit
IRC (Ping timeout: 272 seconds)
14:03 *** jbott <jbott!supybot@nat/redhat/x-bftkgoghfxdwibyf> has quit
IRC (Ping timeout: 272 seconds)
22:19 *** jbott <jbott!supybot@nat/redhat/x-wxdxevjybbitcevv> has quit
IRC (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
23:23 *** jbott <jbott!supybot@nat/redhat/x-cafuloaglxdbvmqg> has quit
IRC (Ping timeout: 265 seconds)
There has been at least one occasion when we had a meeting and jbott
was simply not in the room the entire time.
On Tue 21 Jan 2014 07:45:08 AM CST, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>
> so I found whats wrong - the jbott been running for 4 years and one of
> the things it does when ending meetings is regenerating indexes
> ....that was fast the first couple of years....now its turned "slow"
> because it happens sequentially ;)
>
> I'll see what I can do to fix that dumb logic.
>
> /max
>
>
> On 21 Jan 2014, at 14:36, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>
>>> We have been having a lot of trouble lately with relying on jbott to
>>> record the team meetings on irc. A few times jbott has not been in
>>> the
>>> room. A few times it refuses to start/end meetings.
>>>
>>> Max, is there anything to be done to make jbott more stable?
>>
>> jbott had been running for months without problems (at least none
>> known to me) - then there was
>> a network disconnect at neuchatel office which meant it was off for a
>> bit and then came back on.
>>
>> I know that it has gotten slower at ending meetings, i.e. it now
>> takes some minutes
>> for it to upload instead of seconds as in past. I can look into
>> speeding that up if that is the
>> problem you are seeing.
>>
>> Is that what you are seeing ?
>>
>> /max