On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 2:17 PM, Yoann Rodiere <yoann(a)hibernate.org> wrote:
Still, there are several reasons because of which I'd rather use
"org.hibernate.search.backend.<elasticsearch/lucene>":
- It is closer to how we will probably refer to the module on a
day-to-day basis: I don't know about you, but I'll probably talk about
"the
Elasticsearch backend" rather than "Elasticsearch indexing" or
"the
Elasticsearch module".
So, you might remember that I was the one proposing
"indexing.elasticsearch" and this is the main argument that convinced me.
- It is consistent with our architecture and APIs in Search 6:
- The main component (and entry point) in those modules will be an
object implementing BackendImplementor (SPI)
- We will actually expose "backends" as part of our Java APIs, for
instance to allow users to retrieve the Elasticsearch client, or to query
some backend-scoped metadata.
- We will also use the word "backend" in the user configuration,
where the user will have to define a backend, its type and its options
using the "hibernate.search.backends.<backendName>.*" properties
+ this one.
We can use whatever name we want for Search 5 but I think the "backend"
choice is pretty obvious for Search 6.
--
Guillaume