fwiw... I have a lot of this implemented locally. At the moment it is
"swappable", but I have not yet exposed this as a setting. Also, I
only have (1) and (2) implemented. (2) is implemented by padding with
the main identifier that triggered the batch load.
Plan is to work on (3) tomorrow, if I do not get to it today.
is the issue I am working
for this.
On Thu 01 Nov 2012 10:04:03 AM CDT, Steve Ebersole wrote:
Just to clarify... (3) is not building the entire statement. Most
of
the statement can be pre-built. It just needs to append the proper
IN-condition
On Thu 01 Nov 2012 09:30:41 AM CDT, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> Maybe its best to make this configurable too?
>
> I can see 3 selections:
> 1) current algorithm - the current code as is
> 2) current size break down but with padding - the current code except
> selecting the next higher batch size and padding extras (current code
> selects next smaller size, iteratively)
> 3) dynamic - dynamically build the batch statement
>
> wdyt?
>
> On Tue 30 Oct 2012 02:28:31 PM CDT, Steve Ebersole wrote:
>> Well the other option is to not pre-build/cache the statements for the
>> batch sizes. That would free up memory as well as reduce the number
>> of queries to just one, with the offset being the need to build the
>> SQL dynamically (although most of it could be built up front).
>>
>>
>> On 05/08/2012 02:06 AM, Clemens Eisserer wrote:
>>> Hi Guenther,
>>>
>>>>>> Is it possible to disable prepared statement caching for batched
>>>>>> fetching, so I end up with a single query in the <
>>>>>> default_batch_fetch_size case only >>instead of the
>>>>>> fixed-size batch loading hibernate does by default?
>>>
>>>> I think the main reason for no feedback so far, is that nobody was
>>>> able to understand this sentence.
>>>> Usually 'prepared statement caching' is a synonym to
'prepared
>>>> statement pooling' and is something which has to be provided by a
>>>> connection-pool (or a jdbc-driver) and thus
>>>> Hibernate does actually not implement any prepared statement
>>>> cache/pooling.
>>>> Can you please explain what you intend under 'prepared statement
>>>> caching'?
>>>> Can you also please try to better explain the second part of your
>>>> sentence?
>>>
>>> Sorry for beeing that cryptic, I will try to rephrase it:
>>>
>>> When Hibernate does batch-fetching, it generates PreparedStatements
>>> for certain batch sizes - for a batch_size of 50, the prepared
>>> statements for batch-sizes will have the following sizes:
>>> [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,12,25,50]. When e.g. a batch of size 13 should
>>> be fetched, because of the fixed size of the prepared statements, 3
>>> queries are issued for batch-fetching, although 13 <= 50. In this case
>>> the 3 batches would be of the size 13 = 8 + 4 + 1.
>>> In a latency bound (between db and application) environment, this
>>> serverly hampers response time - instead of a single round-trip to do
>>> the batched fetch, Hibernate requires 3.
>>> (subselect can't be used in my case, because my queries are already
>>> rather complex, and the added complexity confuses the DBs query
>>> planner too much)
>>>
>>> What I did in this case (only for integer PKs) is to pad up to the
>>> next batch size with a non-existant PK.
>>> So, for the example mentioned above, I can use the PreparedStatement
>>> with size 25, and insert padding from 14-25, which will make the query
>>> slightly more inefficient but avoid 2 additioan round-trips.
>>>
>>> - Clemens
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> hibernate-dev mailing list
>>> hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>>>
>>
>
> --
> steve(a)hibernate.org
>
http://hibernate.org
--
steve(a)hibernate.org
http://hibernate.org