What is gained needs to be balanced by what you are giving up.
OGM itself is new, but at the end of the day its a JPA provider which is
not new. Basing on Java 7 will limit adaption from folks wanting to
drop OGM in to their app as replacement for their JPA provider to give
it a spin in certain environments.
On 10/09/2013 07:54 AM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
+1 for requiring Java7
On 9 October 2013 12:55, Gunnar Morling <gunnar(a)hibernate.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In the context of the notorious JavaDoc CSS issue ([OGM-341] - an updated
> stylesheet is required when building our projects with Java 7) Sanne,
> Davide and I were wondering whether we should take the opportunity and
> actually require Java 7 as the minimum version for Hibernate OGM, not only
> at build but also at run time.
>
> This would give us some interesting opportunities for the implementation,
> language-wise (e.g. diamond operator, multi-catch) as well as library-wise
> (e.g. the fork/join framework). On the downside we might exclude some users
> who are still running on Java 6.
>
> Given that OGM is a rather new project, I'd assume though that at this
> point most users are in a more experimental stage of using it. I'd thus
> also expect that they use a more current version than 6 which has reached
> the end of its (public) support lifecycle. So this change might not effect
> many in reality.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> --Gunnar
>
> [OGM-341]
https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/OGM-341
> _______________________________________________
> hibernate-dev mailing list
> hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
_______________________________________________
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev