Year, it was never a rule in search. It's just that we never had a need. At least I
never had a need. I am against artificial exception hierarchies for the sake of separation
but if there is a use case, let's go :)
On 13 juin 2012, at 15:26, Steve Ebersole wrote:
I think thats a bad rule in general ;)
Lack of specific exception types in ORM has been an issue quite a few
times.
On Wed 13 Jun 2012 08:15:48 AM CDT, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> Ok, only for this specific case I created:
>
https://hibernate.onjira.com/browse/HSEARCH-1161
>
> So we won't have a single exception any more, I guess more will come
> as needed now that the "single type exception" rule is broken.
>
> Sanne
>
> On 13 June 2012 13:57, Hardy Ferentschik<hardy(a)hibernate.org> wrote:
>> +1 and as Emmanuel is saying we should take it as it comes
>>
>>
>> On Jun 13, 2012, at 2:49 PM, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
>>
>>> +1 on a case by case basis. That can definitely help here.
>>>
>>> On 13 juin 2012, at 14:05, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm wondering if we should specialize SearchException in some cases
to
>>>> make it easier for business logic to react correctly, like in the case
>>>> of:
>>>>
>>>>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831569#c2
>>>>
>>>> Sanne
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> hibernate-dev mailing list
>>>> hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> hibernate-dev mailing list
> hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
--
steve(a)hibernate.org
http://hibernate.org
_______________________________________________
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev