I find the second reason important. In some organizations, the idea of developers owning a
schema especially on legacy database is harder than climbing the Himalaya bare foot.
Having access to the subselect views helps.
I also like it for completeness since we can override insert / update / delete
statements.
On 20 févr. 2012, at 18:52, Steve Ebersole wrote:
subselects are a feature that was originally put in place to support
databases without view support and/or application developers which did
not have access to create views on their target database.
I am contemplating whether we want to continue to support this.
At this time I all real databases out there support views. Anyone know
of any that do not?
I am not inclined to leave the feature in place just for the second
reason. They could always define the view in a schema in which they do
have access to create views.
Thoughts?
--
steve(a)hibernate.org
http://hibernate.org
_______________________________________________
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev