+1 I see no problem either.
On 17 November 2017 at 15:57, Steve Ebersole <steve(a)hibernate.org> wrote:
Actually its possible that the TCK always tested it and merging
`javax.persistence.Query` and `org.hibernate.query.Query` may be the
culprit. But either way, the net result is the same...
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 8:44 AM Steve Ebersole <steve(a)hibernate.org> wrote:
> I wont bore everyone with the history here, but long story short is that
> we need to start treating JPA "positional" parameters as positional in the
> `javax.persistence.Parameter#getPosition` sense. Even though there is
> nothing positional about JPA's positional parameters, this has moved from a
> philosophical discussion to a practical one as the JPA 2.2 TCK is testing
> this, whereas older ones did not
>
> To do that however, we need to drop our older positional parameter
> support. That feature has been deprecated for quite some time now. Unless
> there are objections, I will plan on dropping that in 5.3
>
_______________________________________________
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev