AFAIK, yes. In scanning through a lot of the unexpected failures, the ones I saw were all caused by an issue with handling temp tables in MySQL, which I am already aware of... -----Original Message----- From: Aleksandar Kostadinov [mailto:akostadinov@jboss.org] Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 7:15 AM To: Steve Ebersole Cc: hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org Subject: Re: [Fwd: hibernate-mysql-testsuite Build Completed With Testsuite Errors] I'll create a build against 5.0 but first I need a confirmation about existing tests. Are they ok? Steve Ebersole wrote: >Well, I'd much prefer using MySQL 5 as that is now the supported >production ready line and is the version I test against locally. I >guess ideally both 4.x and 5.x, if that would be possible, since I am >sure people will continue using 4.x for quite q while. > >If adding or moving to 5.0 is not possible, then this is fine. > >-----Original Message----- >From: Aleksandar Kostadinov [mailto:akostadinov@jboss.org] >Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 6:58 AM >To: hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org; Steve Ebersole >Subject: [Fwd: hibernate-mysql-testsuite Build Completed With Testsuite >Errors] > >Hi again. >Please review the results with mysql 4.1.22 (latest 4.1). There are 2 >tests more passing than with the old one (4.1.10a). > >Do the results satisfy you so I can move to the next database or mysql >should be tunned better? > >Thanks, >Aleksandar > > > >