On Wed 2013-04-03 16:06, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
On 3 Jan 2013, at 3:55 PM, Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel(a)hibernate.org> wrote:
> On Wed 2013-04-03 15:46, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
>>
>> On 3 Jan 2013, at 2:10 PM, Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel(a)hibernate.org>
wrote:
>>
>>> If you work on Hibernate Search, here is a heads up. Make sure to either
run
>>>
>>> mvn clean install -s settings-example.xml
>>>
>>> or add in your settings.xml the profile and associated repository
redhat-earlyaccess-repository
>>> and add it to the list of active profiles. settings-example.xml will
>>> show you everything.
>>
>> I am not a big fan of this. I don't understand why we need to source
artefacts from there. :-(
>
> Where do you want them from? The sky ;)
> A maven repo is a maven repo is a maven repo. I see no difference
> between the JBoss community repo, the Red Hat platform repo and any
> other third-party repo we depend on for that matters.
I do. I think there is a difference between a community repo and a Red Hat platform repo.
We as a community project should depend/use the former.
I don't see the technical nor ideological merit of your position. Both
are open source and even if it was not, I see no reason to depend on non
open bits for test integration purposes. I wish we had the ability to do
that for WAS, Weblogic etc at the time when they changed their
transaction manager internals every full moon.
After all, you use Oracle's JVM most of the time and not OpenJDK.