I think HHH-6855 should be. HHH-6854 is just a test fix, I'd say its not important for backport. I don't think there is actually any code changes for HHH-4358. I may have left that fix version there by mistake. On Thu 19 Jan 2012 04:05:46 PM CST, Gail Badner wrote: > I've created new issues for backporting fixes for 3.6.10. > > Please take a look at: > https://hibernate.onjira.com/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mo... > > > I'm not planning to backport dialect-related issues, although I could > be talked into it. > > Steve, should HHH-6855/HHH-6854 and/or HHH-4358 also be backported? > > Adam, are there any Envers issues that should be backported for > 3.6.10? If so, please create new issues for them and assign as > appropriate. > > Feedback? > > Thanks, > Gail > _______________________________________________ > hibernate-dev mailing list > hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev

I've added an issue for backporting HHH-6855. I thought it was a good idea to include HHH-6854 so that the backport for HHH-6855 would be tested. Let me know what you decide about HHH-4358. Thanks, Gail ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Steve Ebersole"<steve(a)hibernate.org> > To: "Gail Badner"<gbadner(a)redhat.com> > Cc: "Hibernate"<hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org> > Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 6:09:47 PM > Subject: Re: [hibernate-dev] Backports for 3.6.10 > > Actually it is not fixed yet :) Let me think about it. > > On Thu 19 Jan 2012 08:08:56 PM CST, Steve Ebersole wrote: >> I think HHH-6855 should be. HHH-6854 is just a test fix, I'd say >> its >> not important for backport. >> >> I don't think there is actually any code changes for HHH-4358. I >> may >> have left that fix version there by mistake. >> >> On Thu 19 Jan 2012 04:05:46 PM CST, Gail Badner wrote: >>> I've created new issues for backporting fixes for 3.6.10. >>> >>> Please take a look at: >>> https://hibernate.onjira.com/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mo... >>> >>> >>> I'm not planning to backport dialect-related issues, although I >>> could >>> be talked into it. >>> >>> Steve, should HHH-6855/HHH-6854 and/or HHH-4358 also be >>> backported? >>> >>> Adam, are there any Envers issues that should be backported for >>> 3.6.10? If so, please create new issues for them and assign as >>> appropriate. >>> >>> Feedback? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Gail >>> _______________________________________________ >>> hibernate-dev mailing list >>> hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev >> > > -- > steve(a)hibernate.org > http://hibernate.org >