Just to be clear, the testing fix in HHH-6854 does not affect testing
On 01/20/2012 01:39 AM, Gail Badner wrote:
I've added an issue for backporting HHH-6855. I thought it was a
good idea to include HHH-6854 so that the backport for HHH-6855 would be tested.
Let me know what you decide about HHH-4358.
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steve Ebersole"<steve(a)hibernate.org>
> To: "Gail Badner"<gbadner(a)redhat.com>
> Cc: "Hibernate"<hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
> Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 6:09:47 PM
> Subject: Re: [hibernate-dev] Backports for 3.6.10
> Actually it is not fixed yet :) Let me think about it.
> On Thu 19 Jan 2012 08:08:56 PM CST, Steve Ebersole wrote:
>> I think HHH-6855 should be. HHH-6854 is just a test fix, I'd say
>> not important for backport.
>> I don't think there is actually any code changes for HHH-4358. I
>> have left that fix version there by mistake.
>> On Thu 19 Jan 2012 04:05:46 PM CST, Gail Badner wrote:
>>> I've created new issues for backporting fixes for 3.6.10.
>>> Please take a look at:
>>> I'm not planning to backport dialect-related issues, although I
>>> be talked into it.
>>> Steve, should HHH-6855/HHH-6854 and/or HHH-4358 also be
>>> Adam, are there any Envers issues that should be backported for
>>> 3.6.10? If so, please create new issues for them and assign as
>>> hibernate-dev mailing list