Because 1.4.2 was just released when I did that migration, as I already answered on that monsterous JBoss dev list thread ;) I have no issue with upgrading as long as no issues are created by that. On May 15, 2008, at 5:30 PM, Emmanuel Bernard wrote: > Any reason why we target SLF4J 1.4.2 and not 1.5? > _______________________________________________ > hibernate-dev mailing list > hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev ----------------------------- Steve Ebersole Project Lead http://hibernate.org steve(a)hibernate.org

Awesome to see two hibernate developers now spending their energy on such an important refactoring. Keep up the good work. Emmanuel Bernard wrote: > Cool, I've almost completed the migration based on 1.4.2 > A migration with no issue is like cake without ice: not worth it ;) > On May 16, 2008, at 02:35, Steve Ebersole wrote: >> Because 1.4.2 was just released when I did that migration, as I >> already answered on that monsterous JBoss dev list thread ;) >> >> I have no issue with upgrading as long as no issues are created by >> that. >> >> On May 15, 2008, at 5:30 PM, Emmanuel Bernard wrote: >> >>> Any reason why we target SLF4J 1.4.2 and not 1.5? >>> _______________________________________________ >>> hibernate-dev mailing list >>> hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev >> >> >> ----------------------------- >> Steve Ebersole >> >> Project Lead >> http://hibernate.org >> steve(a)hibernate.org >> >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > hibernate-dev mailing list > hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev -- Bill Burke JBoss, a division of Red Hat http://bill.burkecentral.com