IMHO, it makes more sense to belong to Hibernate Search than in the
Persistence Module
WDYT ?
2011/6/27 Jason Porter <lightguard.jp(a)gmail.com>
Pete had mentioned it should belong in Hibernate Search as a CDI
integration instead of Seam.
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 15:27, Shane Bryzak <sbryzak(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> **
> This belongs in the persistence module, we need to coordinate with Stuart
> and Emmanuel to determine how we get it in there (I don't think it will be
> much work).
>
> Shane
>
>
> On 28/06/11 05:19, Jason Porter wrote:
>
> We just finished having a meeting about a Hibernate Search Module (
>
http://people.redhat.com/~manderse/irc.freenode.org/meetings/hibernate-de...).
> One of the questions we need answered is where this module should live. If
> we want it part of Hibernate Search or if it should have the Seam name and
> branding along with it. What are your thoughts on this? Please see the
> minutes for ideas that were discussed.
>
> --
> Jason Porter
>
http://lightguard-jp.blogspot.com
>
http://twitter.com/lightguardjp
>
> Software Engineer
> Open Source Advocate
> Author of Seam Catch - Next Generation Java Exception Handling
>
> PGP key id: 926CCFF5
> PGP key available at:
keyserver.net,
pgp.mit.edu
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> seam-dev mailing
listseam-dev@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>
>
>
--
Jason Porter
http://lightguard-jp.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/lightguardjp
Software Engineer
Open Source Advocate
Author of Seam Catch - Next Generation Java Exception Handling
PGP key id: 926CCFF5
PGP key available at:
keyserver.net,
pgp.mit.edu
_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev