On Mon, 23 May 2011 16:58:12 +0200, Sanne Grinovero
<sanne.grinovero(a)gmail.com> wrote:
It would be fine for me to rename it, assuming it doesn't create
a
mess when backporting patches?
Given our experience w/ Core I would in this case do the rename also on
the 3.6 branch.
At least directory wise. We can always configure the final artifact name
in the pom.
--Hardy