December 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: MC upgrade breaks scoped aop tests in trunk

by kabir.khan＠jboss.com

I reopened the JIRA issuse. Please close it when you have ported the changes Branch_2_0 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4193342#4193342 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4193342

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: MC upgrade breaks scoped aop tests in trunk

by kabir.khan＠jboss.com

This has been done https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBMICROCONT-400 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4193339#4193339 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4193339

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Profiler] - Re: Runtime profiler - linux 64

by esimeoli

I'm experiencing exactly the same problem, building libjobossInspector.so from jboss-profiler-1.0.CR4.zip on 64 bit RHEL5, kernel 2.6.18-92.1.13.el5. Is there any solution/workaround? By the way, if I try to execute: gunzip serverspy_17784_thread_1228127786099_0_1.log.gz I get: gunzip: serverspy_17784_thread_1228127786099_0_1.log.gz: invalid compressed data--crc error Could it be a problem with zlib? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4193338#4193338 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4193338

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: Isn't ServiceInvoker.deliverSync flawed?

by Kevin.Conner＠jboss.com

"ewrdk" wrote : So, have I missed something here? You missed the fact that it is driven through the EPR and message selector. My suspicion, given your description so far, is that you may be suffering from a bug that has been fixed in the CP branches and will shortly be fixed in trunk (for ESB 4.5). If you can provide a better description of your real issue then we may be able to confirm this. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4193336#4193336 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4193336

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Isn't ServiceInvoker.deliverSync flawed?

by ewrdk

Looking at the underlying code (Community Edition 4.4.GA) of the ServiceInvoker I can see the following (JMS epr case): The ingoing message is delivered using TwoWayCourierImpl which in turn uses JMSCourier. The JMSCourier sets the correlationId of the message. So far so good. But when retrieving the outgoing message this correlationId is never used: The pickup method of JMSCourier does not use a message-selector based on the correlationId (it can only use a generic message-selector attached to the jms-filter definition). This in turn means that there is no guarantee that the response message is related to the request message. For a single user scenario this may work, except that previous timed-out messages may be returned instead. In a multi-threaded scenario it will never work. This is f.ex. the case with the RequestResponseBaseWebService class in the Enterprise 4.3 edition. So, have I missed something here? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4193320#4193320 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4193320

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: MC upgrade breaks scoped aop tests in trunk

by kabir.khan＠jboss.com

"alesj" wrote : "alesj" wrote : "kabir(a)jboss.org" wrote : | | | If GBF.createBean(ClassLoader cl) could be made protected rather than private there would be no duplication whatsoever. | | I think this can be easily arranged. :-) | | | I've changed it to protected | + ported your OverrideCL test from Branch_2_0. | | So, Kabir, can you fix this (+ add JIRA) in the trunk | and I'll port the changes then to Branch_2_0? | Thanks, I'll let you know when I am done View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4193319#4193319 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4193319

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: MC upgrade breaks scoped aop tests in trunk

by alesj

"alesj" wrote : "kabir(a)jboss.org" wrote : | | If GBF.createBean(ClassLoader cl) could be made protected rather than private there would be no duplication whatsoever. | I think this can be easily arranged. :-) | I've changed it to protected + ported your OverrideCL test from Branch_2_0. So, Kabir, can you fix this (+ add JIRA) in the trunk and I'll port the changes then to Branch_2_0? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4193317#4193317 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4193317

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: MC upgrade breaks scoped aop tests in trunk

by alesj

"kabir(a)jboss.org" wrote : | If GBF.createBean(ClassLoader cl) could be made protected rather than private there would be no duplication whatsoever. I think this can be easily arranged. :-) btw: weird forum behavior - your post is under my name :-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4193314#4193314 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4193314

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Missing org.jnp.server.NamingServer_Stub

by anil.saldhana＠jboss.com

Scott, I have tested that an introduction of new interceptor to follow the "proxy.SecurityInterceptor" in the proxy, allows the compatibility test to go fine. What do you think? Is this the right approach? If you agree, I will make the necessary changes on Monday. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4193287#4193287 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4193287

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums December 2008